Home

Maxim of law

Maxim of Law
To be able to know is the same as to know.

This maxim is applied to the duty of every one to know the law.

 

Evaluate this statement by reference to the nature and purpose of Equity today.

The term “equity” is in a general sense, associated with notions of fairness, morality and justice. It is an ethical jurisdiction. On a more legalistic level, however, “equity” is the branch of law that was administered in the Court of Chancery prior to the Judicature Acts 1873 and 1875. This was a jurisdiction evolved to achieve justice and to overcome the rigorous and deficiencies of the common-law. Although an ethos of conscience pervades this aspect of the law, equity never bestowed an unfettered jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery to do what was fair in the settlement of a dispute. Embodying aspects of ecclesiastical law and Roman law, equity developed and gradually emerged as a distinct body of law. In time, the system became as hidebound by rules and principles as it common-law counterpart.

It was not until 1875 that equity was practised in the common law courts. The existence of a dual system entailed that, for example, when a defendant had an equitable defence to a common law action, he would have to go to the Court of Chancery to obtaining an injunction to suspend the proceedings in common-law court. He would then begin a fresh action for relief in the Court of Chancery. Facing duality persisted until the Judicature Acts which created the Supreme Court of Judicature and allowed all courts to exercise both a common law and equitable jurisdiction.

Equitable maxims

  1. Equitable maxims are both substantive and procedural; Courts use the maxims in one or two ways: enabling or restrictive.
  2. Enabling pertain to the subject of equitable jurisdiction and the granting of relief
    1. Restrictive causes the court to deny relief
    2. While courts do refer to specific maxims as often as courts in the past., but the equitable maximums help in analysis of issues and in predicting the outcome of a case.
  3. Common Equitable Maxims
    1. He who seeks equity must do equity.
    2. Equity will not enforce an unconscionable contract.
    3. He who comes into equity must come with clean hands.
    4. Equity is not an avenger at large.
    5. Equity aids the vigilant, not those who slumber on their rights.
    6. Equity acts in personam.
    7. Equity follows the law.
    8. Equity delights to justice and not by halves.
    9. Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy.
    10. Equity regards that done which ought to be done.
    11. Equity regards substance rather than form.
    12. Equity imputes an intent to fulfill an obligation.
    13. Equality is equity.
    14. Between equal equities the law will prevail.
    15. Between equal equities the first in order of time will prevail.
    16. Equity abhors a forfeiture.
    17. Equity will not aid a volunteer

 Note: When using the term "God" we may have other ideas of what that refer to! In this post we are not talking about something outside of us! As it was written "God is within you" and within everything else.

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any
likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is
in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the
earth: (duplication)
Resident of the State. Res = thing, Ident = identified a thing identified (no longer a man or woman). Does the term "resident" apply to you?


20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the
iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;

Remember what “duplication” means and that no 2 objects can be in the same space at the same time?

A maxim of law says: "the law does not require impossibilities." Another maxim is, "where the Laws of Holy Scripture and the laws of man are at variance, the former shall always be obeyed."

A "moral choice," is in truth a Higher Law. A law which is given to mankind by, and I quote the Declaration of Independence, 'Nature and of Nature's God." A law assumed by all mankind but more especially in these united States, is the law given us by, "Nature's God," that all men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that is: Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness and that there is an eternal difference between right and wrong and that we are personally responsible for our own actions. Ignorance is not a defence against the behest of this Higher Law but knowledge of this Higher Law more fully condemns the educated.

The supreme law of the whole world is that found In the Declaration of Independence: that we are endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights, i.e. rights that cannot be abridged nor abrogated by any government or law.
When we take this into consideration then we must deem all laws that are in violation of this Highest Law, to be null an void and without merit or value and that we must not follow them.

vs 4-6
Requires receiving, observing, and keeping pure and entire, all such religious worship and ordinances as God has appointed; and zeal in resisting those who would corrupt worship; because of God's ownership of us, and interest in our salvation.
Prohibits the worshipping of God by images, or by confusion of any creature(corporation maybe ?) with God, or any other way not appointed in his Word.

interest
1 a (1) : right, title, or legal share in something

title
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): ti·tled; ti·tling /'tIt-li[ng], 'tI-t&l-i[ng]/
1 : to provide a title for
2 : to designate or call by a title : TERM, STYLE

(Maxim of Law
Legality is not reality)

le·gal
Pronunciation: 'lE-g&l
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle French, from Latin legalis, from leg-, lex law
1 : of or relating to law
2 a : deriving authority from or founded on law : DE JURE b : having a formal status derived from law often without a basis in actual fact : TITULAR <a corporation is a legal but not a real person> c : established by law; especially : STATUTORY
3 : conforming to or permitted by law or established rules
4 : recognized or made effective by a court of law as distinguished from a court of equity
5 : of, relating to, or having the characteristics of the profession of law or of one of its members
6 : created by the constructions of the law <a legal fiction>
synonym see LAWFUL
- le·gal·ly /-g&-lE/ adverb

Main Entry: 1tit·u·lar
Pronunciation: 'ti-ch&-l&r, 'tich-l&r
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin titulus title
1 a : existing in title only; especially : bearing a title derived from a defunct ecclesiastical jurisdiction (as an episcopal see) <a titular bishop> b : having the title and usually the honors belonging to an office or dignity without the duties, functions, or responsibilities <the titular head of a political party>
2 : bearing a title : TITLED
3 : of, relating to, or constituting a title <the titular hero of the play>
- tit·u·lar·ly adverb

Duplicity

Main Entry: du·plic·i·ty
Pronunciation: du-'pli-s&-tE also dyu-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English duplicite, from Middle French, from Late Latin duplicitat-, duplicitas, from Latin duplex
1 : contradictory doubleness of thought, speech, or action; especially : the belying of one's true intentions by deceptive words or action
2 : the quality or state of being double or twofold
3 : the technically incorrect use of two or more distinct items (as claims, charges, or defenses) in a single legal action

vs 7
Enjoins a holy and a reverent use of God’s names, titles, attributes, ordinances, Word, and works.
Forbids all abuse of anything by which God makes himself known. Some Protestants, especially in the tradition of pacifism, read this Commandment as forbidding any and all oaths, including judicial oaths and oaths of allegiance to a government, noting that human weakness cannot foretell whether such oaths will in fact be vain.

Ministers of state act under ecclesiastical canons called "judicial'.


Amish people forbid any sort of graven image, such as photos.

Quakers and pietism have historically set themselves against the Law as a form of commandment binding on Christians, and have emphasized the inner guidance and liberty of the believer, so that the law is fulfilled not merely by avoiding what the Law prohibits, but by carrying out what the Spirit of God urges upon their conscience.

IT IS TO BE NOTICED THAT THERE ARE BUT TWO FORUMS OF LAW IN WHICH THE CIVIL MAY BE COMBINED WITH THE CRIMINAL. ONE IS THE LAW OF ADMIRALTY AND THE OTHER IS ENGLAND'S
ECCLESIASTICAL LAW WHICH DOES NOT SEPARATE CHURCH AND STATE.

IN ENGLAND, THE PARISH OF THE CHURCH AND THE COUNTY ARE ONE AND
THE SAME AND THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE "CIRCUIT" COURT ACTING WITHIN THE MERGER OF LAW AND EQUITY "ACTS AS A COURT OF CONSCIENCE AND A COURT OF LAW AT THE SAME TIME.(to duplicate!!!!! does not have within its powers the atoning grace to erase the actions and abominations commanded under the laws of that government.

(Maxim of Law
Many things have been introduced into the common law, with a view to the public good, which are inconsistent with sound reason. [The law of merchants was merged with the common law]

Proverbs 11:3 says, “The integrity of the upright guides them, but the unfaithful are destroyed by their duplicity.” Integrity means wholeness. Integrity means being unimpaired, honest and whole. A person walking in integrity with God is guided by God and has assurance in God’s leading. Duplicity (perversity, crookedness, dishonesty, falseness) destroys and robs any hope of faithfully standing. Integrity and duplicity are opposites. The person stuck in duplicity is not able to fully trust God, God’s guidance, or hearing God correctly. It is a vicious circle. Even if you could hear correctly, you can’t trust God. Even if you could trust God, surely you could never hear correctly. The Hebrew word translated duplicity is celeph and means distortion, i.e. (figuratively) viciousness.1

Liberty is a right unalienable and therefore to suggest any person can be in a state of involuntary servitude by a government enacted commercial currency system that allows a person no means to access his right to liberty is to advocate government sponsored trespass.

The system had to be from its inception one that a person participates in daily by agreement, but NOT by contract. If the person has no opt out clause the agreement is unlawful because it would be a trespass.


LUKE ch.16 (Expatriation also)
7 Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? And he said, An hundred measures of wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore.
8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.
9 And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.
10 He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much.
11 If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches?
12 And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man's, who shall give you that which is your own?
13 No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
14 And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.
15 And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.
16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

(Man, on the other hand, is an anomaly in this discussion of law because man possesses a trait unique and set apart from the other beasts of nature. Man exercises imagination. Man can construct an abstract of his observations of reality and in so doing create a reality not contemplated by nature. Assuming for the sake of argument that an ant lacks the power of imagination, the ant then cannot cognate the idea of doing anything else other than hauling the cargo through the tunnels of the colony. The moss cannot imagine not growing on a rock or exposed tree root. The tiger cannot contemplate harvesting soybeans as an alternative protein to the gazelle that it chases down and kills with its claws and jaws. Man alone (as far as we know) possesses this trait.

This means man can imagine his way outside of the law. Man is the only creature that can push that envelope. He can agree to commerce outside those boundaries, he can breach, trespass, defy, and rise above the law. But man cannot change the law. It is this fact that makes our statutory maze of codes and regulations so maddening. Yet the most difficult concept many have in their comprehension of the statutory wonderland is that it does in fact conform with the notion that man cannot change the law. )

17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.

Matt. ch.5
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one iote(jot,iota) or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

When trying to ascertain and understand the law it is often helpful to look to nature and recognize the laws we tend to never question.

One need look no farther than the obvious in nature to also find identifiable examples of agreement. Hydrogen and Oxygen hook up and make water. Flame identifies the agreement of heat, carbon, and oxygen. Polar magnetism, moss on a rock, tree roots in the soil, the train of cargo hauling ants in the colony, the planets in orbit…all these unique events of nature demonstrate a harmony of agreement.


IOTA
1 : the 9th letter of the Greek alphabet
2 : an infinitesimal amount:JOT
JOT
: the least bit : IOTA
INFINITESIMAL
2 : immeasurably or incalculably small <an infinitesimal difference>
infinitesimal calculus
1 a : a method of computation or calculation in a special notation (as of logic or symbolic logic)4 : a system or arrangement of intricate or interrelated parts

Main Entry: at·om
Pronunciation: 'a-t&m
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin atomus, from Greek atomos, from atomos indivisible, from a- + temnein to cut
1 : one of the minute indivisible particles of which according to ancient materialism the universe is composed
2 : a tiny particle : BIT
3 : the smallest particle of an element that can exist either alone or in combination
4 : the atom considered as a source of vast potential energy

Combined with a form of fusion (thinking you and the strawman are the same) the machines (banks) have found more energy (currency) than they will ever need. Endless fields! Humans are no longer born - we are grown (including a title - birth certificate). For a long time I did not believe it until I seen it with my own eyes. I watched them liquefy (liquidate) the dead (inanimate strawman) so they could be fed intravenously (through the network of commerce) to the living.
What is the Matrix? Control! It is a dream world built to keep us under control in order to change a human being into this (a "coppertop" battery, a production unit that provides energy called "currency" more commonly called money).

Maxim of Law
To know the laws, is not to observe their mere words, but their force and power. [John 6:68]
Law is the science of what is good and evil.
The disposition of law is firmer and more powerful than the will of man.
Energy
Energy is recognized as the key to all activity on earth. Natural science is the study of the sources and control of natural energy, and social science, theoretically expressed as economics, is the study of the sources and control of social energy. Both are bookkeeping systems: mathematics. Therefore, mathematics is the primary energy science. And the bookkeeper can be king if the public can be kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping.(Commerce)
All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?
In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called "moral issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection it was agreed that a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent. (He is in voluntary servitude.)

In order to achieve a totally predictable economy, the low-class elements of society must be brought under total control, i.e., must be housebroken, trained, and assigned a yoke and long-term social duties from a very early age, before they have an opportunity to question the propriety of the matter

The quality of education given to the lower class must be of the poorest sort, so that the moat of ignorance isolating the inferior class from the superior class is and remains incomprehensible to the inferior class. With such an initial handicap, even bright lower class individuals have little if any hope of extricating themselves from their assigned lot in life. This form of slavery is essential to maintain some measure of social order, peace, and tranquillity for the ruling upper class.


MATT ch.5 (Jurisdiction also)
16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
21 Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
23 Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee;
24 Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift.
25 Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.

Power. [LL potere, to be able, from L. posse, from potis, able + esse, to be.] Ability to act; the faculty of doing or performing something; capability; the right of governing or actual government; dominion; rule; authority; a sovereign; a spirit or superhuman agent having a certain sway (celestial powers); the moving force applied to produce the required effect;

Power of Acceptance. Capacity of offeree, upon acceptance of terms of offer, to create binding contract.

When you get an offer, THE OFFEROR JUST PUT YOU IN A POSITION OF POWER! What an honor! Why not accept that gift?

Maxim of Law
To know the laws, is not to observe their mere words, but their force and power. [John 6:68]

Matt 21 (Remedy)
22 And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.
23 And when he was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?
24 And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things.
25 The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him?
26 But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet.
27 And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things.

By way of endorsing this fact, the constitution of the United States of America clearly states that the condition of "involuntary" servitude shall forever be prohibited. The key word here is "involuntary." This means that your natural Rights cannot be converted to privileges (without your consent), and privileges cannot be converted to Rights (without consent of the authority).

(Maxim of Law)
All law has either been derived from the consent of the people, established by necessity, confirmed by custom, or of Divine Providence.

Who Is The Boss?
All power rests with the People. After all, it is the People who created government in the first place. Since the 'created" cannot be greater than the "creator", it must follow that the government is something less that the "creator" and must by its very nature be the "creator's" servant. This is true until you voluntarily allow the servant to be your master. Which is what most people have done to themselves É made public servants their masters. The government cannot do anything for you or against you without your consent. Your consent is either given in writing, by what you say (verbal consent), or by your silence (acquiescence). A maxim of law says: "the law does not require impossibilities." Another maxim is, "where the Laws of Holy Scripture and the laws of man are at variance, the former shall always be obeyed." A maxim of law is something that has been ruled on so many times that it is a firmly established truth, and is no longer up for debate.


Man alone operates as a creature, bound in a material universe with physical boundaries, capable of conceiving and imagining what the natural world rarely seems to demonstrate to all but those with faith. While here, however, man must reconcile that imagination of liberty with the limits the law of his physical existence lays out on the game board. His power of imagination is limitless, but it also suggests his power to imagine himself right out of the equation by failing to guard against the ultimate of human weakness, pride. That weakness demonstrates itself whether the player is a religious fanatic or an unbeliever. One denies man’s ability as an equal partner in this stage play because of the constant need for a supreme deity in the spiritual hierarchy. The other denies man’s intuition to connect with and conceive of realities our science and extensive system of academics falls short of explaining.

Ephesians
006:012
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.


Main Entry: prin·ci·pal·i·ty
Pronunciation: "prin(t)-s&-'pa-l&-tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
1 a : the state, office, or authority of a prince b : the position or responsibilities of a principal (as of a school)
2 : the territory or jurisdiction of a prince : the country that gives title to a prince
3 plural : an order of angels -- see CELESTIAL HIERARCHY (take a look)



mammon
material wealth or possessions especially as having a debasing influence

2. Maxims in law are somewhat like axioms in geometry. 1 Bl. Com. 68. They are principles and authorities, and part of the general customs or common law of the land

Main Entry: ax·i·om
Pronunciation: 'ak-sE-&m
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin axioma, from Greek axiOma, literally, something worthy, from axioun to think worthy, from axios worth, worthy; akin to Greek agein to weigh, drive -- more at AGENT(take look mmm!)
1 : a maxim widely accepted on its intrinsic merit
2 : a statement accepted as true as the basis for argument or inference : POSTULATE 1
3 : an established rule or principle or a self-evident truth

Main Entry: prin·ci·ple
Pronunciation: 'prin(t)-s(&-)p&l, -s&-b&l
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French principe, principle, from Old French, from Latin principium beginning, from princip-, princeps initiator -- more at PRINCE
1 a : a comprehensive and fundamental law, doctrine, or assumption b (1) : a rule or code of conduct (2) : habitual devotion to right principles <a man of principle> c : the laws or facts of nature underlying the working of an artificial device
2 : a primary source : ORIGIN
3 a : an underlying faculty or endowment <such principles of human nature as greed and curiosity> b : an ingredient (as a chemical) that exhibits or imparts a characteristic quality
4 capitalized, Christian Science : a divine principle : GOD
- in principle : with respect to fundamentals <prepared to accept the proposition in principle>
usage Although nearly every handbook and many dictionaries warn against confusing principle and principal, many people still do. Principle is only a noun; principal is both adjective and noun. If you are unsure which noun you want, read the definitions in this dictionary.

Main Entry: 1god
Pronunciation: 'gäd also 'god
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English; akin to Old High German got god
1 capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: as a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe b Christian Science : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind
2 : a being or object believed to have more than natural attributes and powers and to require human worship; specifically : one controlling a particular aspect or part of reality
3 : a person or thing of supreme value
4 : a powerful ruler

in·cor·po·re·al
1 : not corporeal : having no material body or form
2 : of, relating to, or constituting a right that is based on property (as bonds or patents) which has no intrinsic value

(Maxim of Law)
The law which governs corporations is the same as that which governs individuals [godless entities].
When the reason, which is the soul of a law, ceases to exist, the law itself should lose its operative effect.
The law punishes falsehood. Reason and authority are the two brightest lights in the world. The reason of the law is the soul of the law. The reason ceasing, the law itself ceases.
(Person,Corporation,Resident,Defendent NO Soul)

Name change: Your persona changes to a legal fiction with no persona (as a man or woman) standing in judicio (in court) whatsoever. This is accomplished by changing your lawfully "given name" (appellation) to that of a legal fiction. That legal fiction is represented by your name spelled in all capital letters, and may include initials. All government and corporate entities currently issuing ID cards today are legal fictions. They only exist on paper. They do not die (like a man or woman), they live on in perpetuity.
Therefore, when you are identified by a "legal fiction", you must become a legal fiction as well. Remember the "created" can never be greater than the "creator."

Maxim of Law
Human laws are born, live and die. It is a perpetual law that no human or positive law can be perpetual.

Duplicity (perversity, crookedness, dishonesty, falseness) destroys and robs any hope of faithfully standing.

That is, a firm legal attachment has been made between you and the issuing party. By carrying a state issued ID card you are placed "within" the issuing state as a resident of the state. Res = thing, Ident = identified. A thing identified (no longer a man or woman). (NO SOUL)

. Forms an adhesion contract or agreement: The distinctive feature of an adhesion contract or agreement is that the weaker party has no realistic choice as to the terms.


Remember, Holy Scriptures tell us that in the beginning Yahweh (God) created Man in His image. He did not create corporations, franchises, individuals, human beings or monsters. These are the creations of Satan, created in Satan's image.

(Maxim of Law)
a)Many things have been introduced into the common law, with a view to the public good, which are inconsistent with sound reason. [The law of merchants was merged with the common law]
b)The civil law is what a people establishes for itself. [It is not established by God]

c)In ambiguous things, such a construction is to be made, that what is inconvenient and absurd is to be avoided.

The only time anyone is required to have ID is to access so-called privileges and benefits granted by the issuing party. If you have no need for special privileges and benefits granted by others, there is no need for an ID card. Keep in mind that the government has nothing to give.For clarity it is necessary to define the difference between natural Rights, which are unalienable and not within the power of government to grant, and privileges and benefits, which clearly are.

ambiguous
Etymology: Latin ambiguus, from ambigere to be undecided, from ambi- + agere to drive -- more at AGENT(oh here we are again)
1 a : doubtful or uncertain especially from obscurity or indistinctness <eyes of an ambiguous color> b : INEXPLICABLE
2 : capable of being understood in two or more possible senses or ways <an ambiguous smile> <an ambiguous term> <a deliberately ambiguous reply>
synonym see OBSCURE

There cannot be a separation of church and state

We all know that the Satanic religion is in direct opposition to Christianity but we read in Isaiah 9:6 and 7 that this opposition is on all levels including who is in charge of governments.

The identification of individuals has been with us for centuries. Your identity may represent your position of honor, status, or standing among other men and women. You can be self-identified, or identified by others. If you are self-identified, it is usually accomplished by reputation, occupation, noble deeds, character, etc. Being self-identified carries a natural place of honor (or dis-honor) among peers. You are either honest, trustworthy, and of good moral character, or you are not. In other words, the reputation, honor and identification of a good and lawful man or woman, precedes them. They are known for who they are and what they stand for. This form of identification, at its best, is accomplished by a lot of hard work, and by adhering to the highest standards of ethics and moral character.



That is the dumbest phrase I ever heard! It is an impossibility of law to “practice law without license.” In fact, the very concept of a society capable of manifesting order and liberty, side by side, presumes that everyone practice law. It is, however, an absolute necessity to know the law in order to practice it.

(Maxim of Law)


Licenses and franchises offered by the State Of Michigan are similar in nature to those of other such corporations. Ministers of state act under ecclesiastical canons called "judicial'.



IT IS TO BE NOTICED THAT THERE ARE BUT TWO FORUMS OF LAW IN WHICH THE CIVIL MAY BE COMBINED WITH THE CRIMINAL. ONE IS THE LAW OF ADMIRALTY AND THE OTHER IS ENGLAND'S
ECCLESIASTICAL LAW WHICH DOES NOT SEPARATE CHURCH AND STATE.

IN ENGLAND, THE PARISH OF THE CHURCH AND THE COUNTY ARE ONE AND
THE SAME AND THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE "CIRCUIT" COURT ACTING WITHIN THE MERGER OF LAW AND EQUITY 'ACTS" AS A COURT OF CONSCIENCE AND A COURT OF LAW AT THE SAME TIME.
(Maxim of Law
Many things have been introduced into the common law, with a view to the public good, which are inconsistent with sound reason. [The law of merchants was merged with the common law] )
THE CITIZENS HAVE A RIGHT TO OBJECT TO THE DRAFTS OF THE COURT
BY CONSCIENTIOUS SCRUPLES - ON MORAL GROUNDS ALONE IF THEY TRULY BELIEVE THAT THE COURT IS ACTING CRIMINALLY OR FOR IMMORAL PURPOSES. THE ADMINISTRATIVE "WARRENTS" MAY BE OBJECTED TO JUST AS THE CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR WAS/IS ALLOWED TO AVOID THE DRAFT FOR PERSONAL CONFLICT OF LAWS.

THE DISTRICT AND CIRCUIT COURTS ARE COURTS OF LITIGATION AND NOT ADJUDICATION IN MANY INSTANCES RELATING TO ISSUES. LITIGATION IS A WAR-LIKE ADVERSARIAL COMBAT USING LINGUISTIC SKILLS IN DEBATE AND ARGUMENT UNDER PRIVATE, COPYRIGHTS, OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION'S "CRIMINAL" JUSTICE STANDARDS.

IF SUCH ADVERSARIAL COMBAT IS ODIOS TO YOUR CONSCIENCE AND YOU
DO NOT BELONG TO THE SOCIETY THAT PROMOTES THAT ADVERSARIAL AREA, YOU MAY OBJECT THAT YOU FIND THEIR RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SILENT TAKEOVER OF THE ORGANIC STATE CONSTITUTION TO BE REPUGNANT TO ALL THAT YOU BELIEVE IS NECESSARY FOR THE SALVATION OF YOUR SOUL.

DISHONESTY IN PERSONAL AFFAIRS AND IN GOVERNMENT IS REVOLTING AND DISGUSTING TO HEALTHY AND FREE GOVERNMENTS. THEIR DISHONESTY STEMS FROM THE FACT THAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES ARE NOT REDEEMABLE IN SPECIE AND THAT PERFORMANCE TO THE CONTRACT, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IS A VIOLATION OF THE PEONAGE ACTS OF THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES. SLAVERY IS UNCONSCIONABLE
REGARDLESS OF THE COLOR OF OFFICE APPLIED TO ENFORCE THE SECRET AGREEMENTS IN THE NAME OF THE VICTIMS.


9. POLARITY

You may be asking yourself, “how are we like a copper top battery?” The key word here is “polarity!”

Pole [Fr. pole, L polus, the pole of the heavens, from Grk. polos, the axis of the sphere, the firmament, from pelo, to turn or move, Skt carati he moves, wanders.]

Remember what “attorney” means? To “turn” homage and service to a new feudal lord. And who “moves” the court by entering “motions?” In case you haven’t notice by now, we attempt to use the “literal” definitions in a “figurative” sense in order to invite you to think on a higher level of “reality” – so strap in for a rocket ride!

Pole. One of the points of a body at which its attractive or repulsive energy is concentrated (focusing thoughts on),

Polar forces. Physical forces that are developed and act in pairs, with opposite tendencies, as in magnetism, electricity, etc.

DRILL: name some other examples of “polar forces” in today's society that are “developed” and manipulated (racism, religion, politics…..). Why would it be so important to the “power elite” to create opposition in society?

Polarization of Light. A change produced upon light (understanding) by the action (emotion) of certain media (TV, news…), by which it exhibits (dramatizes) the appearance of having polarity or poles possessing different properties.

Media/medium. [L medium the middle, midst, a means] Something placed or ranked between other things; a mean between two extremes; something serving as a means of transmission or communication; necessary means of motion or action; agency of transmission; that by or through which anything is accomplished, conveyed or carried on; a person through whom spiritual manifestations are claimed to be made by believers in spiritualism. Circulating medium. Coin and bank-notes or paper convertible into money on demand.

DEMO; Review the definition of the above 2 definitions.

1. List all the media sources that you can think of (religion, school, parents, TV, radio, movies, newspapers, magazines, government, IRS, just about every single thing in today's society, etc.)
2. How does the “media” produce changes in understanding by dramatizing the “appearance” of people having different properties?
3. How can the media be a means to instill or evoke “emotion” (to move out of the mind) in you so that it appears that you are confused?
4. Why do you think the media call themselves “production companies” and the controllers of them “producers”? What do you think they are really “producing”?
5. What “means of transmission” (transmitting utility) was created to separate you from your possessions?
6. How could one get separated from one’s property and sovereignty by using the “accepted circulating medium” (Federal Reserve Notes)?

Polarization of a battery – the connections (contracts) at which the current (currency) passes from the battery (creditor) to the external circuit (public circulation), the stting up of a back (debt) electromotive force owing to the deposition (deposit) of gases (promissory notes) on the electrodes (in the banks).

Desire. [L desidero to desire, from de to take away + sidero the mind, from siderus a constellation] To wish for possession, to long for, an emotion or excitement of the mind directed to the attainment or possession of an object from which pleasure is expected.

DEMO: How did the power elite “polarize” us into using our attraction for things as an energy source, Copper top? Perhaps the “desire” to own a “new car or house for NO MONEY DOWN and NO INTEREST”? Demonstrate this method to your team mate.

The secret of revealing the power of desire is – everything you see that you want was made using YOUR CREDIT! Everything you see is ALREADY YOURS. This subject will be detailed in the courses ahead.

So it appears that our emotions are at play here as a vehicle to “create lack.” It appears that others are “feeding” off of our emotions as an energy source, but it “appears” we ourselves cannot enjoy our own energy, our own credit. What exactly is emotion and how does it create “polarity”?

Emotion. [L emotio, from emoveo, from e out from + moveo to move] a moving of the mind or soul, a state of excited feeling of any kind as pleasure, pain, grief, joy, astonishment;

Could it be summarized by the above definition that “emotion” means “to move out” of the mind or soul or perhaps YOURSELF? Where before you had the emotion you were “one” or in agreement, by experiencing emotion you are now “divided” or separate?

Motion. The act or process of changing place; the passing of a body from one place to another; movement of the mind or soul.

Move. To carry, convey, or draw from one place to another; to cause to change place or posture; to set in motion, to influence, causing to move or act; impelling; exciting the feelings, touching, pathetic, affecting.

DRILL: List several examples of how the system has been able, through emotion, “to change you from one position to another”, from sovereign to “citizen”, creditor to debtor, owner to renter, etc.

Basically emotion moves you into another place, thereby dividing your attention or focus to where it would “logically” need to be. It is not the intent here to degrade emotion or call it a bad thing – it is a state of existence, it just IS. One can be aware of emotion and experience it, feel and ACCEPT it at that very moment in time. When one does this, the emotion “moves” out of you as easily as it came in. Basically it disappears, just like on the circle. It comes into existence as a creation from your past (#3), you decide to take responsibility for it (#3 1/2), you accept it (#4), you consume and experience it fully (#5), you take it into your mind as an experience (#6), and it disappears (#7). However, one can ignore it, fight it, hide it, degrade it and DIS-HONOR it (all #3). In which case, the emotion will be “a stuck flow.” If you do not “move” with the emotion, that energy will turn into a mass or ridge and become solid and heavy. It will weigh you down like a “ball and chain.” Where have we heard that before?

The “powers that be” KNOW this concept and use it brilliantly to their advantage. We, on the other hand, have been unaware of this powerful mechanism and have been content NOT KNOWING we are being used to produce this energy and make it manifest into material wealth for the “guys at the top.”

What about the repulsion of something, how does that create energy for the power elite? You mean like taxes, getting a ticket, going to court, going to the dentist, war, etc.?

DRILL: Think about all the things that you do not like in your life. Write them down. How could these things be developed and promoted by another to give you anxiety and worry? How could someone benefit by you being in fear or anger over any of the things you listed?

Power of acceptance. Capacity of offeree (you) upon acceptance of terms of offer, to create binding contract.

You have it in your “power” to accept every offer and turn it into a contract on your own terms and conditions. However, if you fight, deny or otherwise dis-honor the offer, you turn your service to another where they are the head and you become the tail.

It is an attorney’s job to “turn” your attention and focus to another lord, another entity other than yourself. Their expertise is to divide you and they do this job extremely well. When we go to court and argue or fight it, we dis-honor ourselves because we are not accepting it. We are “repulsed” by the accuser and may become fearful or angry. We may think that there is “another power greater than ourselves,” or that we are “separate” from the images and sensations that we may be experiencing at the time.

Guilty. [Anglo Saxon gildan – to pay, payment] justly chargeable with a crime (commercial liability); Webster’s Consolidated Encyclopedic Dictionary, 1939 edition

But, what if we plead guilty? What are you saying when you say “guilty”? Isn’t this a “bad” thing? As you well know, all crimes are commercial liabilities. Instead of saying “I am guilty”, you are REALLY saying “I am payment, I can pay, I am the CREDITOR in this matter and I will discharge the debt.” You are saying “the debtor is chargeable and I, as the creditor am going to pay with my signature as payment, just like all the other credit that I have created with my signature, which the municipalities and corporations have been capitalizing on up to this point.” You are saying, “I don’t have to get permission from the Federal Reserve System to use MY OWN CREDIT. The Fed intentionally did NOT print enough Federal Reserve Notes to cover the interest payments known as “income taxes” (which creates the national debt) which they keep “bleeding” out of public circulation. So, I am bypassing them and their faulty accounting system and will handle this matter myself as the principal to discharge the national debt.”

One must admit that the idea behind this system we are speaking of is absolutely brilliant, if not admirable. Who would have ever thought that the statement “I am guilty” means “I am the creditor who can pay”? There is a universal principle at work here, “what you resist persists,” but on the contrary, “what you accept and admire disappears”!

DEMO: Get 2 magnets and demonstrate how the manipulation of polarity produce opposite energy forces.

1. Take the 2 magnets and arrange the positive pole to the negative. Now pull the magnets apart approximately ¼ of an inch and hold it there and feel the force of “attraction.”
2. Now put the 2 negative poles together. Push them together and feel the “repulsion” and force of this energy.
3. How could these forces of attraction and repulsion be used to produce energy?
4. How could these “opposing points of view” be used to produce “currency”?
5. How could saying “I have it” instead of “I want it” create a more positive attitude.
6. What if you looked at something you disliked until you could find how you are responsible for it and accepted it. Would that problem disappear if you truly started to admire it?

DEMO: What one resists persists – what one admires disappears!

If something “influenced” you to do something that you normally would not do, could one consider this to be an “attempt to control”? We could say this of the “bankers” and “the government”, but it would then be giving our power away to something outside ourselves.

If an outside influence can divide us through emotion and keep us in a state of “desire” or “denial” (both in #3) without our awareness, then they can suck our blood from us. They can drain our production and even though we may exhibit a snivel or complaint we keep on producing for them. Divide and conquer!

DRILL: Get a piece of paper and draw a circle in the middle.

1. Draw a line inside the circle going perpendicular from top to bottom with 2 equal halves.
2. Draw a second line inside the circle going horizontal from left to right with 2 equal halves. You should now have a circle divided in to 4 equal quarters.
3. Now label the 4 directions as you learned in course 2 starting with the top being EAST, the bottom – WEST, the left – NORTH, and the right – SOUTH.
4. Divide the circle into 8 sections and label them 1, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 & 7 starting from the left, down to the bottom and up to the top.
5. Label the left half of the circle above the horizontal line – PUBLIC/DEBIT and the right side – PRIVATE/CREDIT.
6. Enter one million dollars in the lower left quarter of the circle and also on the lower right quarter of the circle.

Now what does this look like – possibly a t- account? This is what your straw man looks like – a t-account. It was created by the state to keep an accounting of the straw man’s DEBT on the left/negative/public side of the account that the “government” uses, as well as the CREDIT on the right/positive/private side of the account to show they owe you as the CREDITOR until the debt is discharged.

7. Start from the top of the circle and trace around the inside of the circle going to the left and down until you reach the bottom. Now draw a stick man hanging from the t-account or “on the cross.”

Appliance/apply. [L applicare, to fasten to, from ad to + plico to fold]

This is you when you think that you are the straw man. This is you when you don’t accept their offers and you dis-honor. You get “stuck” with the bill, you are not crossing over to the right side of the account, the private side. If you remain on the account, you act as the source of the energy AND you act as the appliance to be utilized by others – namely the power elite. You allow the “currency” to go through you, but YOU DON’T GET TO USE IT YOURSELF!

You must redeem the offer so that you can use your own credit. When you do this, you “close” the account (circuit) and now you can use the acceptance as “currency” (current/power/energy). If you do not cross over to the right/private/credit side of the account, one could say that you get “hung-up on the crossing” or “hung on the cross.”

Who was “hung” on either side of Christ when he was crucified? Two thieves were. Who “represents” these 2 thieves in the t-account scenario? Remember on the circle where the moon is? It is at the bottom under the maritime law and the sea of
commerce in the West. What is the definition of moon – a illuminated, night – to twist or “turn” from the light. This is where the attorney gets you to deny and then by using your emotions, “turns” or polarizes your attention outside yourself in the sea of confusion in maritime courts. This is the theif on the left side.

Since you are the appliance in the middle “acting like a transmitting utility,” who is on the right side metering or “counting” the energy that you are producing? It is the accountants or bankers who count, tally and bank your production. Banks are stuck in #5 – consume. Banks are one of the few entities in this world which consumes others production without exchange. This is the thief on the right side.

8. Draw a line around the inside of the circle starting from the bottom to the right until you get to the top of the circle again.
9. Notice that when you “cross over” into #4, that this is acceptance. Now you have 3 sections or units to go before you can discharge the debt. The 3 units represent the 3 days and 3 nights Christ was in the earth and corresponds to the 72 hours (3 days) banks have to either honor or dis-honor an acceptance. If you do not hear from them (he who has an ear, let him hear), then they have accepted even if they say they do not at a later date.
10. Once you are in #7, the debt “disappears” and you “rise again” to your sovereignty.

We have UNLIMITED energy and resources – IF we are of one mind. But, when we get stuck in emotion, we polarize our self and allow others to suck the energy from us. What if you could “pull yourself together” whenever the media attempted to divide you through emotion?” What if you could focus and operate with one mind in every action you do? You would be at one with your universe. You would be “the one.”

Editors note:

None of this information can be used in the court. It is for you information in order to point a way to proceed!

Add comment

User Guide is located at here. There you can also find tags for adding media to your comment


Security code
Refresh

joomla templatesfree joomla templatestemplate joomla
2017  GeneticMemory   globbers joomla template