Mas­sive Mis­con­cep­tions #1: The Rule of Law

The rule of law is a hack­neyed phrase. It’s one those giant mis­con­cep­tions usu­ally trot­ted out by peo­ple intent on prov­ing how richer 1st world nations are more bet­ter than poorer 2nd and 3rd world nations, or how no one can sup­pos­edly get away with crime because we are all equal before the law. Yes, I would pre­fer to live in a soci­ety where dis­putes can be resolved with­out resort­ing to gang-​style vio­lence. How­ever, even nations with the pur­ported rule of law still have deal with gang prob­lems – and they do this by cen­tral­iz­ing power all under one roof, claim­ing a monop­oly on vio­lence and call­ing it “Gov­ern­ment”. When you replace lots of smaller gangs with one big­ger gang, it is doubt­ful you have increased your safety or free­dom at all; in fact, in many ways, you have decreased it, since you have cre­ated a orga­ni­za­tion with the power to enslave you on a far grander scale.

Remem­ber the words of George Bush Sr. when he first pub­licly called for a New World Order? He boasted that, “We have before us the oppor­tu­nity to forge for our­selves and for future gen­er­a­tions a New World Order. A world where the rule of law – not the law of the jun­gle – gov­erns the con­duct of nations.” He actu­ally used the phrase rule of law. Given his past as a CIA direc­tor, oil prof­i­teer, drug run­ner, ser­ial rapist and mass mur­derer, how cred­i­ble are his claims that the rule of law will result in a fair and just soci­ety? Recently in her cam­paign, career crim­i­nal Hillary Clin­ton made ref­er­ence to “no one too big to jail” in a tweet that back­fired badly, given how egre­gious it is that she is still walk­ing free (and even run­ning for pres­i­dent) after her count­less instances of steal­ing, cheat­ing, lying, brib­ing, black­mail­ing and mur­der­ing (via the Clin­ton body count). How can you pos­si­bly have the “rule of law” when the ones admin­is­ter­ing the law are crim­i­nals, out­laws, liars and killers?

The fact is that we live in two worlds – one whose mem­bers or cit­i­zens are pun­ished by not liv­ing by the rule of law, and another where the admin­is­tra­tors of the law escape pun­ish­ment because they con­trol the enforce­ment of the laws. The judi­cial sys­tem is not pure and above the law; it has its own mem­bers who cover up crimes and who are involved in the world­wide pedophilic ring (see whistle­blow­ers Fiona Bar­rett and David Shurter for more on this). Elec­tions are stolen by rigged machines. The enti­ties and cor­po­ra­tions sup­posed to be con­trolled and con­strained by the “rule of law” are the ones writ­ing the laws! Remem­ber how the banks write the laws? Remem­ber how Big Pharma con­trols the FDA and CDC?

There is one law for the rich, and one law for the rest.

Addi­tion­ally, as Chi­nese philoso­pher Lao-​Tzu said, the greater the num­ber of laws and enact­ments, the more thieves and rob­bers there will be. Many laws today don’t exist to catch the real crim­i­nals, but rather act as traps to enslave inno­cent and harm­less peo­ple in vic­tim­less crimes, by way of rev­enue extrac­tion (e.g. speed­ing fines) or impris­on­ment (e.g. for pos­sess­ing a plant like cannabis). The rule of law? What a mis­con­cep­tion!

Mis­con­cep­tions #2: The Polit­i­cal Author­ity of Gov­ern­ment

Another one of those rather large mis­con­cep­tions car­ried around by the aver­age per­son is that gov­ern­ment has the unques­tion­able author­ity to rule. How­ever, as I explored in the arti­cle Get­ting the Idea of Gov­ern­ment & Polit­i­cal Author­ity Out of Your Mind, when you look at it closely, the government’s sup­posed author­ity or man­date evap­o­rates into thin air. There is no pro­ducible piece of paper that you signed called a “social con­tract”; there is no real con­sent where there is no real way to opt-​out; there is no legal or moral jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for a major­ity to forcibly impose its views and will on a minor­ity; and lastly, gov­ern­ment does not deserve a spe­cial moral sta­tus just because it pro­vides ben­e­fits to some, which we may or may not need and want. Care­ful exam­i­na­tion of gov­ern­ment shows that its pur­ported polit­i­cal author­ity is built on a house of sand, and has no solid basis. The truth is that gov­ern­ment rules by the bar­rel of a gun, and its author­ity is utterly ille­git­i­mate.

Mis­con­cep­tions #3: The Sci­en­tific Method

Another phrase that gets thrown around like some 3 word argu­ment win­ner is “the sci­en­tific method”. This is often invoked in defense of crim­i­nal or even heinous things and activ­i­ties like pre­scrip­tion drug­ging of the pop­u­la­tion, vac­cines, GMOs and geo­engi­neer­ing (to stop the imag­ined man­made global warm­ing non-​phenomenon). In even more extreme cases, we have the deploy­ment of sci­ence as a weapon to serve crazy schemes, such as eugenics-​based pro­grams of sur­rep­ti­tious ster­il­iza­tion and depop­u­la­tion. Sci­ence itself as a dis­ci­pline is not to blame for this; the issue is those push­ing for­ward dan­ger­ous agen­das under the rubric of sci­ence. Yet, most peo­ple will blindly bow down to the white-​coated priests of sci­ence with­out any fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tion.

How can we trust the sci­en­tific method when there is such a mas­sive amount of fraud­u­lent sci­en­tific research, as exposed by insid­ers like for­mer Big Pharma direc­tors, doc­tors, med­ical jour­nal edi­tors and other experts? How can we trust the much-​praised sci­en­tific hier­ar­chy of evi­dence when it is so easy to get around the back door by var­i­ous means of fraud, whether it be out­right omis­sion, dis­tor­tion by chang­ing data sets and many of the other tricks used to change real sci­ence into cor­po­rate junk sci­ence? How can we trust sci­ence when it tells us the vac­cines saves more hypo­thet­i­cal lives over­all, despite the fact they injure, par­a­lyze and kill real peo­ple all the time? The doc­tors of allopa­thy or West­ern Rock­e­feller med­i­cine once labored under hor­ren­dous mis­con­cep­tions, such as prac­tic­ing blood-​letting as a med­ical and sur­gi­cal tech­nique, and advo­cat­ing the smok­ing of tobacco as fine for your health (“Doc­tors smoke camels”…). Was any of this real sci­ence? If not, how do we know that today’s sci­ence is any bet­ter?

Sci­ence, although it tries to present itself as a ratio­nal force for the advance­ment of knowl­edge, often suc­cumbs to the trap of falling into dogma. Sci­ence has a hard time dis­tin­guish­ing its facts from its the­o­ries. Rel­a­tiv­ity is a the­ory. Big Bang is a the­ory. Maybe good expla­na­tions, maybe not, but they will be replaced by bet­ter ones as our aware­ness expands. Sci­ence wants its one mir­a­cle (e.g. the Big Bang) to explain the world – “just give me one mir­a­cle and I’ll explain every­thing!” It is doubt­ful whether sci­en­tific dogma is any bet­ter than reli­gious dogma. Sci­ence demands that the world be seen in a cer­tain way – and brands any­one out­side of its beliefs as a denier or heretic. Ulti­mately, how much can we really trust main­stream West­ern mate­ri­al­is­tic sci­ence when it denies the exis­tence of any­thing it can­not see and mea­sure? Even Ein­stein said that “the field is the sole gov­ern­ing agency of the par­ti­cle.” Con­scious­ness is the very basis of mat­ter and life in the Uni­verse, and yet sci­ence in gen­eral refuses to even accept its exis­tence …

Mis­con­cep­tions #4: The Greater Good (Col­lec­tivism)

Next of the list of grand mis­con­cep­tions is the idea of “the greater good” as it is applied to gov­ern­ment, where it is known as col­lec­tivism. In small groups, this method often works well, and some­times the “major­ity rules” approach is the best. How­ever, when you try to trans­late that to large soci­eties or nations, you run into prob­lems. At first “the great­est good of the great­est num­ber” seems so obvi­ous and ben­e­fi­cial. How­ever, col­lec­tivism pri­or­i­tizes the group over the indi­vid­ual. Social­ism, marx­ism, com­mu­nism and fas­cism are all col­lec­tivist polit­i­cal ide­olo­gies that essen­tially dic­tate that all indi­vid­u­als, causes and other loy­al­ties (e.g. fam­ily, nation, reli­gion) are sub­servient to the State. They demand that every­one take part in the “new order” and that if nec­es­sary the indi­vid­ual must be sac­ri­ficed for the greater good. In extreme col­lec­tivist soci­eties, the State is every­thing and the indi­vid­ual is noth­ing – an absurd inver­sion of real­ity. (As an inter­est­ing aside, col­lec­tivism has some­thing in com­mon with Satanism here, in that both invert real­ity: black is white, war is peace and pain is plea­sure.)

Col­lec­tivism allows for major­ity rule. A more intel­li­gent and peace­ful minor­ity can eas­ily be out­voted and turned upon by an emo­tional, low-​minded major­ity – which is pre­cisely why the US was set up as repub­lic (with inbuilt pro­jec­tions for indi­vid­u­als) not a democ­racy. The whole con­cept of “the greater good” or “the group” is abstract. In real­ity, there is no such tan­gi­ble thing as a group. There are only indi­vid­u­als who make up a group. The same goes for the “State”. In real­ity, there are only peo­ple who make up the State. When you ele­vate the imag­ined needs of an abstract entity (the “group” or the “State”) above the real needs of its liv­ing mem­bers, you open the door for all sorts of atroc­i­ties.

The truth is that only by respect­ing and enshrin­ing the indi­vid­ual above all else can we achieve the greater good.

Remem­ber also that 1 of the 3 most chill­ing con­spir­acy doc­u­ments or account­sever pub­lished (The Pro­to­cols of the Learned Elders of Zion) pro­claim how the elders or con­trollers will enslave the masses through – you guessed it – col­lec­tivism. They actu­ally use this term.

Mis­con­cep­tions #5: We Are Alone

Another of the grand human mis­con­cep­tions is that we are all alone in the Uni­verse. There’s no other intel­li­gent life out there. We’re it.

Peo­ple who cling to this out­dated and incred­i­bly lim­ited idea may want to check out the broad scope of con­tact, abductee and eye­wit­ness tes­ti­mony of those who have per­son­ally encoun­tered ETs (extrater­res­tri­als) and aliens. Some have endured great trauma but lived to tell the story, while oth­ers have had pos­i­tive expe­ri­ences, and have even formed ongo­ing rela­tion­ships with ETs. Sim­i­lar sto­ries come in from all over the world, from all sorts of peo­ple. We have ancient myths, art­work and cul­tural sto­ries which describe or depict UFOs and ETs. The human race has already been “con­tacted” and indeed may even have been “seeded” by ETs. It’s time to get past our ego­cen­tric­ity that we are the only intel­li­gent species in the Cos­mos, and start open­ing our minds and hearts to greater pos­si­bil­ity.

Mis­con­cep­tions #6: Coin­ci­dence The­ory

The terms con­spir­acy the­ory and con­spir­acy the­o­rist were devel­oped by the CIA in the 1960s as a way to counter gen­uine exam­i­na­tion into the JFK assas­si­na­tion. They are weaponized terms which rep­re­sent a cun­ning method to dis­credit truth­seek­ers, truthtellers and inves­ti­ga­tors. This diver­sion­ary scheme has worked well – peo­ple often shut down once they hear this phrase and stop think­ing crit­i­cally. These terms have become falsely asso­ci­ated, in pop­u­lar cul­ture, with mad­ness, crazi­ness and deluded think­ing.

Of course, the corol­lary to the idea of so-​called deluded con­spir­acy the­o­ries is that things just hap­pen by chance. Thus, those who deride con­spir­acy the­o­ries, often with lit­tle or no inves­ti­ga­tion, can be labeled coin­ci­dence the­o­rists. They adhere to coin­ci­dence the­ory which blindly believes there is no New World Order agenda; events just occur ran­domly. It is hard for the aver­age per­son who feels com­pas­sion and empa­thy to under­stand that the world is run by psy­chopaths with a dead­ened con­science and abil­ity to feel. So, the aver­age per­son can’t quite believe that any­one could be so evil, dia­bol­i­cal, ruth­less or orga­nized to be plot­ting a world takeover, even though the scheme is quite advanced. This inher­ent bias in most peo­ple works to the great advan­tage of the New World Order manip­u­la­tors, who are in essence pro­tected from their crimes by wide­spread dis­be­lief. As Mar­shall MacLuhan once said, “Only the small secrets need to be pro­tected. The big ones are kept secret by pub­lic incredulity.”

Coin­ci­dence the­ory is really a way for peo­ple to shield them­selves from the ugly truth so they can con­tinue liv­ing in denial. Inter­est­ingly, it aligns with mate­ri­al­is­tic and athe­is­tic main­stream sci­ence, which insists that life is just a ran­dom occur­rence and that human­ity is noth­ing spe­cial.

Mis­con­cep­tions #7: Dis­be­liev­ing the Scope of the Con­spir­acy

Despite the mis­con­cep­tions of coin­ci­dence the­o­rists, there are pos­i­tive signs. The world is awak­en­ing. There are many peo­ple work­ing on dif­fer­ent fronts to bring down the con­trol grid and cre­ate bet­ter, fairer and freer sys­tems. Peo­ple around the world are actively protest­ing the cor­po­ra­toc­racy, toxic vac­cines, GMOs, sur­veil­lance, smart meters, geo­engi­neer­ing and more. How­ever, there still remains a fun­da­men­tal block in the way of a deeper under­stand­ing. The last mis­con­cep­tion on this list is the biggest one: many peo­ple still can’t quite grasp the enor­mity and extent of the world­wide con­spir­acy.

All the man­i­fes­ta­tions of dys­func­tion in our world today – polit­i­cal cor­rup­tion, radi­a­tion, bioter­ror­ism, false flag events, mind con­trol, pedophilia, Satanism – are all fun­da­men­tally con­nected. They are not ran­dom and uncon­nected events. Think GMOs and geo­engi­neer­ing are unre­lated – then why does Mon­santo hold patents for aluminum-​resistant crops (chem­trails are laden with alu­minum)? Think false flag shoot­ings, Big Pharma drug­ging and mind con­trol are unre­lated – then why do these patsy shoot­ers have records of tak­ing pre­scrip­tion drugs? Think pedophilia and Satanism are unre­lated – then why do var­i­ous SRA (Satanic Rit­ual Abuse) sur­vivors give accounts of being at places like Bohemian Grove and either wit­ness­ing or being forced to par­tic­i­pate in dark sac­ri­fi­cial rit­u­als?

We need to con­nect the dots and sense the deeper con­nec­tion here.

Dig deeper and you will dis­cover a core group of indi­vid­u­als (the New World Order) who are coor­di­nat­ing all of this.

Dig deeper and you will dis­cover it is the same NWO indi­vid­u­als engag­ing in all of it: polit­i­cal manip­u­la­tion, pro­pa­ganda dis­sem­i­na­tion, geo­engi­neer­ing, mind con­trol, sex traf­fick­ing, pedophilia, war, geno­cide, sup­pres­sion of free energy tech­nol­ogy and the Secret Space Pro­gram.

Dig deeper and you will dis­cover these same NWO indi­vid­u­als sum­mon­ing and chan­nel­ing dark forces through these rit­u­als – and being over­taken by them.

Dig even deeper and you will dis­cover these dark forces (Archons) – which are non-​human, non-​organic, non-​physical enti­ties – resem­ble some­thing like AI (Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence). They are totally heart­less and with­out com­pas­sion; like a par­a­site, they are try­ing to suck dry and destroy their host – you and I and the rest of human­ity. As best as we can tell at this point in our research, they are the dis­tor­tion at the source of all the con­nected and inter-​related uncon­scious­ness or evil in our midst.

Until we grasp the mag­ni­tude of the sit­u­a­tion, we will be fight­ing it on iso­lated fronts, unlikely to be as effec­tive.

Beware of Mis­con­cep­tions

Mis­con­cep­tions abound. The faster we can learn to dig beyond a term or phrase, the faster we will learn the truth.