With all the talk of mandatory vanccinations I think it vital that we remember that mandatory vanccinations are the the good of the public, but, more importantly that there must be no contridiction that there is a need for mandatory vanccinations. It is even more vital when all of the major media outlet are in the hands of a few individuals who, for all we know, might be just one person!
All of the public servants have taken an Oath, they are sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign or Domestic! Title 18 Section 23 81
Our Constitutions laws do not only apply to peace officers, judges, but any public servant or servants. Ie Contractors state license boards, Building departments, planning commissions, Park rangers, any public servant that violates the Constitution or that attempt to aid in extortion, through unjust enrichment of their office through fines or fees that violate Constitutional law. Or that aid in tyranny or assist in a dictatorship with the soul purpose in design to set aside or supplant the United States and its Constitutional law and any of its ammendments
Oath of office Title 18 sect, 2381 Marbury vs Madison Oath of office Title 18 Section 2381 6th amendment constitution is supreme all laws must be constitutional or they are mute.
Unconstitutional Official Acts 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256: The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement.. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it’s enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
§2382. Misprision of treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
§2384. Seditious conspiracy If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
It is high time these socialist that aid and support Unconstitutional dictators are brought to justice. title 18 section 2382: That anyone of us (We the people ) can and should file a criminal complaint in a federal court of law, against any public servant that violates their oath of office. It is also within the power of we the people to file a complaint, a civil suit in a federal court of law as well as a class action law suit under federal jurisdiction against any public servant that violates any of our Constitutional amendments. It is our duty by Constitutional law Misprision of treason! Title 18 Section 2382
A public servant or officer of the court cannot claim immunity Supreme Court reports 100 vol P.1398 Maine vs fibbado 1982 100 supreme Court 100 vol p.2502 Also Owen vs city of independence Missouri : 1982 Officers of the court claiming to act in good faith does not relieve said officers from liability. Willful depravation or ignorance of the law cannot be claimed by a judge or officer of the law who’s duty is to know the law. No judicial immunity if you violate someones constitutional rights! All officials who violate a citizens rights under Constitutional law put themselves in peril of criminal and civil recourse! As a citizen cannot claim ignorance of the law much less an official of the court. Sec. 241 & 242 Sec 1983, 1985, 1986 Violation of constitutional rights does not relieve from liability any officer of the court. Establishes your right to sue anyone who violates your constitutional rights.
Briers vs U.S. Sec 273 U.S reports vol p.28 Pay attention to note #3 Police corruption : Have the right to record or video in public any public official Glik vs Cunnifee 655 f3d 78 ( 1st cir 2011 All video shall be held as evidence in the prosecution of violation of oath of office.