Cognitive Dissonance often happens when taken to a Higher Frequency
Their seems to be many for profit gurus of the law in these days. Some claim to have been in jail and some do not make such claims. I’m not clear how going to jail makes one an expert at law, but there are many things that can get pass a person who has no understanding of the matter at hand. Understanding the matter at hand when it is new to you requires that you keep an open mind and pay close attention. The worst thing one can do as a student or a teacher is to have a close mine or assume that you already know or should know.
Last year I was introduced to a show on internet radio. This show concerns itself with many issues the main one being going to court. It is a public service show (in that the show provides a small public service with additional options for more in depth help). And for that I commend the show because it takes a lot of dedication to be able to do a show every day of the week. That being said, many times teachers on this subject become vainglorious and therefor complacent. When that happens it becomes hard to see new ways. (that really were always there!) For that reason I took more time to give a concerted effort to present this story in the best light for the host. This is a story of Cognitive Dissonance!
Cognitive Dissonance
(Social psychologists refer to cognitive dissonance as the presence
of congruent relations among cognition [thought and understanding]). “When dissonance is present, in addition to trying to reduce it, the person will actively avoid situations and information which would likely increase the dissonance”.
In this case the host has been told and believes that one must play by the rules of the court at all times. He experiences cognitive dissonance when told that that is not always the case. To understand what I was telling the host it is suggested that you listen to this short story I call “Seat Belts 3 which should explain how the process works. then listen to the call in, and we can dig deeper after you have.
Seat belts 3
Talk Show call In
Please keep in mind that we all agreed that we have the right to contract as put forth by the people for the governing bodies in the Constitution : No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
(Title of Nobility : Esq * which is a lawyer)
So the court can’t impair my right to contract! Which means they (the court) can’t tell me or you that one must take a lawyer even if he will not contract with you. That would be impairing your rights. (YOU GOTTA KNOW WHO YOU ARE!)
Lawyers are officers of the court and they are responsible to the judiciary for the propriety of their professional activities. In other words, their first obligation is to the court, which provides them a means of living. So if you don’t have a contract with the lawyer how do you know who he is working for?
Notice that the host first reaction is to put the speaker into a category! (ie “He must be a Moore”) which is an error of assumption, [an attempt to reduce dissonance] to bring what I am saying in line with his thinking. He refuses to hear that I am more than willing to accept a lawyer. But with prejudice , he must sign a contract to work for me! This can not be viewed as an unreasonable demand as it is part of their trade to write contracts.“So demand a contract”!
This seem to be the hardest fact for the host to accept, an unexpected curve in the perception of the law! Then it really get strange when he starts telling me that “what I want to do is, form a contract with the lawyer and accept his appointment
(which is what I’ve been talking about all along!) After the host make some interesting statements about public and private in conjunction with courts and debt collection!” (I’m not sure he is seeing the big picture. The federal reserve is not a part of the government and they are the problem not the solution.)
It’s not clear if he knows that the courts are duplicity in action, and if you do not make the court, your court. It becomes or remains a court of equity. As far as being seen by the court, how can anyone see a straw-man (a fiction)? In other words, the only time the court can’t see you is when you do not understand! As per the maxim (He who dose not understand is not present!) So if the court is acting like your not there, it is most likely because you do not understand what is going on. When you do understand they tend to dismiss the case or leave the courtroom.
Anyway he agrees with me about the ratification of commencement, but I am unsure of that because he goes on to talk about commercial courts .He does not understand that a ratification of commencement is about the real party of interest, and that in commercial court when dealing with the state as the plaintiff there is no real party of interest!
I was promised that he would look into what I was saying. As I, in fact asked him to, because of the number of people who look to him for help. And if he had, he would have been able to help the caller that called in just a few weeks later.
.
This is the situation that the caller stated he was in. He somehow got into a confrontation with a policy enforcement officer(aka) police, and he was also on probation. He told the host that his court case was that Friday and that he would probably be going to jail.
And the host agreed, He would be going to jail because there was no way he was going to get the paperwork in!
Which is the reason for the emergency litigation process.
I was unable to connect via phone that day.
There are to many errors in understanding to put into in this post and it might seem to some if I continue, that I have a bone to pick.But as stated I commend the afford.
But if requested, I will post a comment on them. (errors) If more understanding is needed…
When the ears of the student are ready to hear, Then commence the lips to fill them with wisdom…
The Kybalion

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Comments
http://geneticmemory.org/index.php/justus/30-freespeech-raido
RuleOfLawRadio.com it is better to study the ways of law before you need it.
5 years. You obviously have listened
Yusef El: Let’s look at this! The re-post of seat-belts occurred Sunday, 07 of December 2014 at 5:16 pm so that is three (3) years ago but the story is a re-post that I retrieved from the Internet Way Back Machine. Which is why the post states that the story occurred from one and one half to six (1−1÷2 to 6) years ago.
So the first story was posted nine (9) years ago. And was the most important stories/event as to why GeneticMemory is still up as a website. There was no blog talk then!
No what is interesting is, that what you are referring to is more than five years old. That kind of make me think you didn’t even take to time to do what you said you would. In my first year of high school I was a 5% (five presenter) if you have never heard of them no big deal. But we had a saying “Word is bond” as a matter of fact that where the saying comes from. Which mean you do what you say you will do!
Maybe you should have just read the post Track Record in about-us section you and
could have come up with a better protest. It is true I only listen to one show and
that was the show that I made the call into after being told about the show from a friend. I was my intent on working with and for you. I make that offer to anyone I think is out to help people.
There have been many that I have offer my help to. But like you the offer falls on deaf ears.(But as the wise men say “When the ears of the student are ready to hear, then commence to fill them with wisdom.)
This is why the site is still small and very few know about it. Not all ears are ready to hear. I was ready to help at no cost to you, if and only if I could convince you to work for the people, and not for the fiction which is the dollar. Truth be told I would have still worked for you if you would have understood
that a man can not have two masters. (Have two conflicting ideas) It creates cognitive dissidence. (As I almost stated on your show but didn’t wish to be rude.) listen to the conversation again and you might here where I cut myself off.
The only way out of that is to drop one of the conflicting ideas or use double-think.
You have chosen the latter because it is a sure path to an F.R.N. (aka) the dollar bills. Your advisers should have advised you not to post this here! But all are free to post here.
Breaking the enemy resistance without fighting, that’s not my idea it is Sung Tzu: The Art Of War!
Check GeneticMemories track record. You are too slow! Or maybe your arms are just too short to box with god aka The truth
you have obviously conducted in a limited sphere which is demonstrated by your myopic
paradigm of the legal syst
Yusef El this is truly interesting you say that I am myopic. That is the reason I could not support your affords Your myopic view of educating the people for a dollar. Which as I said I could deal with if not agree with, as long as your information would be helpful. Or at least “Do No Harm!“
Yusef El: It seems I missed a question. WHAT MAKES YOU (me) AN EXPERT ON THE LAW?
In cases like yours, it needs to be made clear what is law? It’s not very hard to understand the law. Here is the complete extent of the law, DO NO HARM! What you talk about is not law it’s legal. So your question should be what make me an expert on legal matters. The answer, Nothing!
Yusef El, I put a lot of energy into what I see as truth. Now you have hit on the subject that is of some note.
I am hurt! Whenever you hurt my brother you hurt me.Here is another interesting fact the story in question
(Cognitive Dissonance at High Frequency!) was posted Monday, 08 December 2014 10:35 PM but you are just now protesting it.
And you would not have posted now but for the fact that you are now attempting to sell some information that for those who know, is freely available.
the future and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I
could I want to suggest you some interesting things or advice.
Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article.
I want to read even more things about it!
It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come
here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme?
Superb work!
Thanks, glad you like it.
suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!
any question send to mail@geneticmemory.org
RSS feed for comments to this post