21 year of ser­vice to the community

masyhead

The Cur­rent Year is 6264

I am not this hair or this skin. I’m the soul that lives within!

We are now setup with SSL to pro­tect user I.D. Don’t be an out­sider, come and see!


I’ve been get­ting harassed by some­one who calls them­selves snoops for truth. It seems that his like­li­hood or Hobby, is to tra­verse the inter­net and find any­one who is talk­ing about com­mon law and chal­lenge them. It also appears that he does this so much that he loses track of who he con­ver­sated with and to who he is talk­ing to at the moment. Let me tell you why I say that, before we get onto the main sub­ject. ( If you can get pass this first part, there a les­son and have a chukle at no ones expence.) Snoops for truth attempted to post on my site and assort­ment of failed cases of peo­ple who went to court with­out a lawyer and attempted to defend them­selves. I don’t know any of these cases or any of these peo­ple so I asked him what has this to do with me?

Some of the dia­log follows.

My Com­ment: If that is the case and you think that what I say is a hoaxes write a com­ment that I can reply to.

His Reply: I have no idea what you say. So, I have no idea whether you are involved in hoaxes or not. Send me some mate­ri­als to review (or tell me how I can find them myself) and I will take a look.

That reply explaines why I said ” his like­li­hood or Hobby, is to tra­verse the inter­net and find any­one who is talk­ing about com­mon law and chal­lenge them.” I no longer think that, now I think he just spams any­one who seem like he is talk­ing about law that is com­mon. So I decided to give him a sim­ple exam­ple of what I’m talk­ing about. Noth­ing to hard, and maybe other might learn some­thing from it. Watch these two cases, and we will talk more. These cases show that there are com­pas­sionet Judges in the court sys­tem. How­ever, being a judge is a job, and all jobs have rules that nor­man­lly should be fol­lowed. As a mat­ter of fact the judge has the char­ac­tor of all but 2 of the judges I have been before. But maybe I’ve been lucky, but it never made a difference.

So lets look at these cases.

Case num­ber 1 the defend­ent is clearly guilty, but not only because he was speed­ing. He is guilty because he was work­ing! What do I mean? He was pro­form­ing a com­mer­cial activ­ity at the time. The rea­son there are com­mer­cial laws is to pro­tect the pub­lic. If you still don’t quit under­stand why, it is all made clear in “Seat Belts 1″ But to con­tinue, the judge could have find him because there no stated hour that one must fol­low, at lease in my town. So he could have said you were speed­ing or you were not! It is impor­tant to under­stand that the judge is there to be impar­tial nei­ther on the pros­e­cu­tor side nor the defence. Clearly, the judge was not impar­tial and the pros­e­cu­tor did not push the issue. Two points for the judge and 1 for the prosecutor!

The sec­ond case is just the oppo­site, and ofcouse I am assum­ing because I don’t know if in the 15 or so times he was stop if he was work­ing. But let’s assume he was not. In that case if he was trav­el­ing it becomes a cour­tesy to pass, or to wait for the red light after stop­ping, not stop­ping at all is reck­less. What I am say­ing is that if no one got injured and there was no prop­erty dam­age, he could, if he knew his rights, have the case dis­charged. But that was not the case, he did have a lawyer and it seems a good one. ( the most impor­tant thing to remem­ber is that the pub­lic defender has to work within the con­finds of Ok, now I must say this, not all lay­w­ers are bad. when the Bible says “Wo, unto you lawyers, you have taken away the key of knowl­edge” it was not talk­ing about every lawyer than or now. But, I’m not a scholar on that sub­ject. I’m just one who under­stand that the law is made more com­pli­cated by the fact that there is more than one type of law, how­ever, the peo­ple think there is only one.

So, what do I think about the pub­lic defender? Per­son­ally, I try to stay as far away from them as I can. Not because I belive they are all bad, but their job is to defend you in a com­mer­cial court and has to work within the con­finds of the com­mer­cial process. I believe I know enough about the max­ims of law to eval­u­ate what need to be done. How­ever, if one has no under­stand of where he is (what kind of court) then the best thing for them is a pub­lic defender. The prob­lem with pub­lic defend­ers is that it is a crap shoot, you might get a good one, and you might not, In the case above he got a good one.

The last thing I will say is, many peo­ple who know some com­mon law feel that the court is try­ing to get them. That because even tho they know the law, they don’t know what kind or I should say which court they are in. This make them upset and they attempt to that their frus­tra­tion out on the court. This site has been taken down more times than I can remem­ber when I was on Go-​Daddy. That was some time ago, and I learned my les­son. Get off Go-​Daddy. Any­way I had a story which I called Penum­bra, the def­i­n­i­tion of the word is:

A space of par­tial illu­mi­na­tion (as in an eclipse) between the per­fect shadow on all sides and the full light

In that story I said some­thing I heard, now a long time ago, which is “Be a wise as a ser­pent and as harm­less as a dove” This is the only way to go into a com­mer­cial court. that can also be said as ” if you want things to work out keep a level head.

I should also say,

This is a judge wor­thy of being called “YOU HONOR” not because he fol­lowed the law, but, because he fol­low his conconscience.

With these sto­ries I hope to empower the com­mu­nity (There is only one race and one com­mu­nity! Beige is the same as brown, so every­one is brown) even if we don’t act like it!


Com­ments

# RE: Your Hornor!Adinkra­hene 2020-​11-​06 10:26
Still no reply from Snoops4truth! :zzz
Reply

If you do noth­ing else, Check out the for­got­ten post sec­tion on the home page (Top Left). It’s the rea­son the site was made. If you are going to court read or lis­ten to Free Speech Radio, Seat-​belts 1 & 2 and Cog­ni­tive Dis­so­nance at High Frequency!In that order. Posted in Audio and text format.

Who Dat ?

We have 107 guests and no mem­bers online

Truth-​Rated “R”

Breadcrumbs

In Shadows