I’ve been getting harassed by someone who calls themselves snoops for truth. It seems that his likelihood or Hobby, is to traverse the internet and find anyone who is talking about common law and challenge them. It also appears that he does this so much that he loses track of who he conversated with and to who he is talking to at the moment. Let me tell you why I say that, before we get onto the main subject. ( If you can get pass this first part, there a lesson and have a chukle at no ones expence.) Snoops for truth attempted to post on my site and assortment of failed cases of people who went to court without a lawyer and attempted to defend themselves. I don’t know any of these cases or any of these people so I asked him what has this to do with me?
Some of the dialog follows.
My Comment: If that is the case and you think that what I say is a hoaxes write a comment that I can reply to.
His Reply: I have no idea what you say. So, I have no idea whether you are involved in hoaxes or not. Send me some materials to review (or tell me how I can find them myself) and I will take a look.
That reply explaines why I said ” his likelihood or Hobby, is to traverse the internet and find anyone who is talking about common law and challenge them.” I no longer think that, now I think he just spams anyone who seem like he is talking about law that is common. So I decided to give him a simple example of what I’m talking about. Nothing to hard, and maybe other might learn something from it. Watch these two cases, and we will talk more. These cases show that there are compassionet Judges in the court system. However, being a judge is a job, and all jobs have rules that normanlly should be followed. As a matter of fact the judge has the charactor of all but 2 of the judges I have been before. But maybe I’ve been lucky, but it never made a difference.
So lets look at these cases.
Case number 1 the defendent is clearly guilty, but not only because he was speeding. He is guilty because he was working! What do I mean? He was proforming a commercial activity at the time. The reason there are commercial laws is to protect the public. If you still don’t quit understand why, it is all made clear in “Seat Belts 1″ But to continue, the judge could have find him because there no stated hour that one must follow, at lease in my town. So he could have said you were speeding or you were not! It is important to understand that the judge is there to be impartial neither on the prosecutor side nor the defence. Clearly, the judge was not impartial and the prosecutor did not push the issue. Two points for the judge and 1 for the prosecutor!
The second case is just the opposite, and ofcouse I am assuming because I don’t know if in the 15 or so times he was stop if he was working. But let’s assume he was not. In that case if he was traveling it becomes a courtesy to pass, or to wait for the red light after stopping, not stopping at all is reckless. What I am saying is that if no one got injured and there was no property damage, he could, if he knew his rights, have the case discharged. But that was not the case, he did have a lawyer and it seems a good one. ( the most important thing to remember is that the public defender has to work within the confinds of Ok, now I must say this, not all laywers are bad. when the Bible says “Wo, unto you lawyers, you have taken away the key of knowledge” it was not talking about every lawyer than or now. But, I’m not a scholar on that subject. I’m just one who understand that the law is made more complicated by the fact that there is more than one type of law, however, the people think there is only one.
So, what do I think about the public defender? Personally, I try to stay as far away from them as I can. Not because I belive they are all bad, but their job is to defend you in a commercial court and has to work within the confinds of the commercial process. I believe I know enough about the maxims of law to evaluate what need to be done. However, if one has no understand of where he is (what kind of court) then the best thing for them is a public defender. The problem with public defenders is that it is a crap shoot, you might get a good one, and you might not, In the case above he got a good one.
The last thing I will say is, many people who know some common law feel that the court is trying to get them. That because even tho they know the law, they don’t know what kind or I should say which court they are in. This make them upset and they attempt to that their frustration out on the court. This site has been taken down more times than I can remember when I was on Go-Daddy. That was some time ago, and I learned my lesson. Get off Go-Daddy. Anyway I had a story which I called Penumbra, the definition of the word is:
A space of partial illumination (as in an eclipse) between the perfect shadow on all sides and the full light
In that story I said something I heard, now a long time ago, which is “Be a wise as a serpent and as harmless as a dove” This is the only way to go into a commercial court. that can also be said as ” if you want things to work out keep a level head.
I should also say,