masyhead

The Cur­rent Year is 6263

Wile, we broad­cast our pirated single

The full Youtube clip can be viewed here

Akoben Adinkra­hene
I can believe that they are telling teach­ers to teach this to chil­dren! I’m shocked that not one of them asked about repul­sion as a sta­bi­liz­ing force in the uni­verse . Grav­ity is an attrac­tion power as far as I know it does not repel. There­for all of the planet would have to do (at some point) the same thing the balls did, which is end up in the middle.

If not, this would mean that iner­tia (which is the rea­son­ing use to state that the plan­ets would not slow down) is as strong as (if not stronger than) grav­ity. Truth is grav­ity is one of the weak­est forces and can by no means hold the uni­verse together when it can’t even pull the note off my refrig­er­a­tor. How­ever the same force (mag­netic attrac­tion) that holds the note on the refrig­er­a­tor (which is more that 10,000 times stronger) also has the repul­sive power equal to it’s attrac­tion power. Which one seems the best to do the job? Think about that!

Asi­nine Rhetoric
You pretty much debunked your­self just now. Grav­ity is a rel­a­tively weak force and, like you said, iner­tia and momen­tum can eas­ily over­come it. This means you don’t need a repul­sive force, as iner­tia itself is more than enough. The only rea­son these mar­bles are falling into the cen­ter is because of fric­tion. Fric­tion from rolling on that sheet actu­ally decel­er­ates the mar­bles, so if fric­tion didn’t exist, they would keep rolling or “orbit­ing”. Fric­tion does not exist for the plan­ets in our solar sys­tem.
Mag­net­ism is not suf­fi­cient in explain­ing what we call grav­ity. It only works prac­ti­cally on ferro-​magnetic met­als, oth­er­wise you need mas­sive amounts of energy to get the same effect as grav­ity.
It seems to me like grav­ity is still the best for the job. Not to men­tion there’s mas­sive amounts of math­e­mat­i­cal proof and data to sup­port it, yet none of that exists for mag­net­ism in this context.

Akoben Adinkra­hene
Asi­nine Rhetoric : Maybe you should read what you just typed and extend your thoughts on the sub­ject. If the only forces that we are con­sid­er­ing is grav­ity, iner­tia and momen­tum and if momen­tum and iner­tia is enough to pro­pel a body pass the point of gravity’s pull (on said body) then what is bring­ing the body back into a sta­ble orbit? Because as you posited the force of momen­tum and iner­tia have push said body pass the pull of grav­ity. Now let’s look at this demon­stra­tion of mag­netic attrac­tion and repul­sion and see if it brings any­thing to mind.

https://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​L​y​v​f​D​z​R​L​s​i​U


(One does not need let­ters behind their name to think!)
I almost for­got to address your state­ment about mag­net­ism. What does the planet and a mag­net have in com­mon? Well, our planet has a north and a south pole and it just so hap­pens that a mag­net has a north and south pole also. How do we know this? One way is that we can use a com­pass and what does a com­pass work off of? Magnetism!One more thing you can make math do what ever you want it to do, it’s all in the interpretation!

Added later…

If we were to talk about the uni­fied field the­ory we talk of 3 forces 1. the weak force 2. the strong force 3.the elector-​magnetic force. Which of the 3 is the weak force? In case you didn’t know it is grav­ity! So the weak­est force of the 3 is the force that holds the uni­verse together is that what you are telling me?

Akoben Adinkra­hene The “demon­stra­tion” you pro­vided was a lit­tle com­i­cal. That is a toy review video, not a sci­en­tific demon­stra­tion. The effect in that demon­stra­tion is not sta­ble at all. As soon as you lift the mag­nets off the table, they will stick together. Also, the Earth and Sun sys­tem is noth­ing like that. They are orbit­ing around their cen­ter of mass, mean­ing the Sun is also orbit­ing the Earth slightly.

Akoben Adinkra­hene No you can’t make math “do what ever you want it to”. That state­ment just shows you have no idea how math works. It’s com­pletely black and white. Your inter­pre­ta­tion has noth­ing to do with solid math­e­mat­i­cal proof. If you lack math­e­mat­i­cal proof, then your point of view is use­less. These mod­els exist because we need to pre­dict things accu­rately, not because they sound fancy. (Edit) Why are you delet­ing your com­ments? Do you not take the time to review them before you post?

Akoben Adinkra­hene Are you not going to explain what you believe? It seems odd you deleted your other com­ment and edited your sec­ond to be some­thing dif­fer­ent. That’s a pretty dis­hon­est thing to do, and shows you aren’t really able to have a mature dis­cus­sion. Hon­estly I feel bad for you. This sub­ject is so sim­ple that I was hop­ing I could help you avoid embar­rass­ing your­self. Seems that didn’t go too well.

(he is upset that I com­bined two post!

(should I get another reply it will be posted here.)

Asi­nine Rhetoric
No you can’t make math “do what ever you want it to”. That state­ment just shows you have no idea how math works. It’s com­pletely black and white. Your inter­pre­ta­tion has noth­ing to do with solid math­e­mat­i­cal proof. If you lack math­e­mat­i­cal proof, then your point of view is use­less. These mod­els exist because we need to pre­dict things accu­rately, not because they sound fancy. (Edit) Why are you delet­ing your com­ments? Do you not take the time to review them before you post?
Akoben Adinkra­hene If math need no inter­pre­ta­tion tell me what is being expressed in this state­ment ( r=2Gm/c^2 ) where “^” is to the power of (in this case 2)
And if you do get it right can you say for a fact that any­one who see it will also get it right?
(genet­icmem­ory read­ers will remem­ber this from the post ” Stephen Crothers: The Par­al­lax Effect on Short Hair
Asi­nine Rhetoric

Akoben Adinkra­hene Per­haps you should attempt to edu­cate your­self more on this sub­ject. You seem to be con­fused as to what forces are present in space and how they inter­act. It seems silly debat­ing about this con­sid­er­ing it’s com­mon knowl­edge we wouldn’t stay on Earth if grav­ity didn’t exist, but I guess I’ll try to make this eas­ier for you to under­stand. If you have an object that has a greater iner­tia than the force of grav­ity act­ing on it, then it will fly off into space. Inversely, an object that has a greater force of grav­ity than it’s iner­tia, it will col­lide with what it’s orbit­ing. A sta­ble orbit hap­pens when the tan­gen­tial iner­tia and the force of grav­ity are bal­anced out. Grav­ity may be con­sid­ered rel­a­tively weak, but it’s not use­less. It’s strength is directly pro­por­tional to the mass of an object. So it can eas­ily over­come iner­tia if the object is very small com­pared to the body it’s orbit­ing. Such is the case with the Sun and the Earth. The Sun is 109 times more mas­sive than the Earth. (Edit) You linked this video, but deleted your com­ment for some rea­son https://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​L​y​v​f​D​z​R​L​s​i​U The “demon­stra­tion” you pro­vided was a lit­tle com­i­cal. That is a toy review video, not a sci­en­tific demon­stra­tion. The effect in that demon­stra­tion is not sta­ble at all. As soon as you lift the mag­nets off the table, they will stick together. Also, the Earth and Sun sys­tem is noth­ing like that. They are orbit­ing around their cen­ter of mass, mean­ing the Sun is also orbit­ing the Earth slightly.

(You may notice he asked me to explain what I have said. And I have not said any­thing that need to be explained he will con­tinue to do this in his state­ment.) This is his attemp at the Jedi mind trick.

How that work is you try to make one think that you are some kind of expert, then you talk down to them, most impor­tantly don’t answer questions.

Akoben Adinkra­hene
I hope I’m not talk­ing to some­one who is see­ing things! Now don’t put words in my mouth “if grav­ity didn’t exist” When did I ever say grav­ity didn’t exist? We just don’t under­stand it. And that is not just my opin­ion. And if we did we would not need pro­pellers to fly.

(editor’s note ) After some time think­ing I see I made an error. I should have said “grav­ity dosen’t exist” But that would have really con­fussed things even more.


Quote: “The effect in that demon­stra­tion is not sta­ble at all” (demo of mag­nets above)

Where is the insta­bil­ity. Please explain. To many peo­ple like you think they can declare some­thing to be true with­out giv­ing any expla­na­tion of what they are say­ing. But this is what it has come down to in every part of life peo­ple say­ing things that just are no so. So please explain!

Many peo­ple would call Newton’s mod­els toys today. But the rea­son he made those toy was to demon­strate a point of fact, and not to make toys for chil­dren.

“They are orbit­ing around their cen­ter of mass, mean­ing the Sun is also orbit­ing the Earth slightly.”
Please go back and read the ques­tion until you under­stand what the ques­tion was.

Here is the best weapon that you have to use on the masses it called par­rot­ing and the most used state­ment is that it is “com­mon knowl­edge”.
It is com­mon knowl­edge that a dol­lar bill is money. But how can it be money if it printed with­out back­ing? It can’t be! But because it’s com­mon knowl­edge (that it is) we have all been robbed and some of the peo­ple have even lost their homes because of “com­mon knowl­edge”.

You said “Per­haps you should attempt to edu­cate your­self”

Yes I could have said that to you also if I intended to be rude, but I’m not.

In one state­ment you say” A sta­ble orbit hap­pens when the tan­gen­tial iner­tia and the force of grav­ity are bal­anced out.”
This is one pos­si­bil­ity and has a chance of maybe hap­pen­ing 1 in 10,000,000 times. In the model I have shown it would hap­pen every time. Are you start­ing to see?

Toys are the best tools for demon­stra­tion. What do you think is being used in this demon­stra­tion? It’s a big toy! every­one there would play with it (exper­i­ment with it) if they could. Oh and please for­give the dele­tion. I can under­stand how it must be to go to read some­thing that’s not there…

(all ques­tion he has ask I have replied to above)

Akoben Adinkra­hene It’s amus­ing that you’re try­ing to dou­ble down on this asi­nine notion that math is just up to inter­pre­ta­tion. That whole para­graph you wrote about it com­pletely misses the point. If you can’t actu­ally read the math, of course you don’t know what it says, and you may as well be read­ing Chi­nese. That’s not really sur­pris­ing, but the point is, once you under­stand how it works, it is extremely black and white. If some­one inter­prets “^” as some­thing other than an expo­nent, then they are wrong. It’s that sim­ple. This whole tirade of yours is essen­tially a des­per­ate attempt to avoid pro­vid­ing math­e­mat­i­cal proof for what you believe. The point of math­e­mat­i­cal proof is not to con­fuse peo­ple like you that don’t under­stand it. It’s main func­tion is to pro­vide a way that a per­son can actu­ally use the model being pre­sented. If your model doesn’t have this, it has no way we can use it, and is there­fore use­less by def­i­n­i­tion. “We just don’t under­stand grav­ity. And that is not just my opin­ion. And if we did we would not need pro­pellers to fly.” We under­stand grav­ity mul­ti­tudes bet­ter than what­ever it is you’re try­ing to argue for, mainly because you don’t have any math­e­mat­i­cal proof we can use. Air­craft were invented using our math­e­mat­i­cal under­stand­ing of grav­ity. We had to under­stand how an object fell due to grav­ity before we were able to counter grav­ity with aero­dy­nam­ics. “What do you think is being used in this demon­stra­tion? It’s a big toy!” It seems you missed the point of this video. It’s not a demon­stra­tion, it’s a sim­ple visu­al­iza­tion meant for high school kids. It does not prove any­thing about how grav­ity works and doesn’t attempt to.

“Oh and please for­give the dele­tion.” That’s fine, but I rec­om­mend you take the time to actu­ally read your com­ment before you post them. You might save your­self fur­ther embar­rass­ment if you do.

Asi­nine Rhetoric Point 1. What is amus­ing is you still are attempt­ing to use that Jedi mind trick where what­ever you say we have to believe with­out ques­tion, exam­ple or expla­na­tion for any­thing. Again I don’t (at this time) know if you are able to read or is it your com­pre­hen­sion? I have already said “I never said math was use­less” But you will keep on that vain because you have no where else to go. Your state­ment ” If you can’t actu­ally read the math, of course you don’t know what it says, and you may as well be read­ing Chi­nese” This is truly an asi­nine reply to the state­ment that math has to have an inter­pre­ta­tion for the masses to under­stand it. I am try­ing my best to be polite but the “asi­nine” (lol) state­ments you are mak­ing is what made me, make the last state­ment about your com­pre­hen­sion. If I say to you that math has to have an inter­pre­ta­tion for the masses to under­stand, then Only a fool will come back with the state­ment “If you can’t actu­ally read the math, of course you don’t know what it says, and you may as well be read­ing Chi­nese.” HELLO THE MASSES CAN“T READ THE MATH ! MY POINT! Also I would have to assume that you are one of the masses see­ing you have no clue what the equa­tion refer to.

Point 2. Please prove that only math was indeed needed to make the first flight?

The Pin­na­cles con­sisted of a gorge with a river flow­ing through it and unique large boul­ders cre­ated dur­ing the ice age on its slopes. The updraft cre­ated by the ter­rain attracted soar­ing birds. The Wright broth­ers reg­u­larly observed birds there from 1897 to 1899. (Got to won­der why they spend 3 years watch­ing bird when all they had to do was the math.)
ID10T in other words Idiot! Also just because you can over come grav­ity does not mean you under­stand it. We over­come grav­ity with hot air bal­loons does that mean that the peo­ple mak­ing hot air bal­loons under­stand grav­ity? I think not.

It does not say the Wright broth­ers spend many days and night get­ting the cor­rect math in order to fly the first air­craft. No they watch birds to get the aero­dy­nam­ics cor­rect. Of cause that was in the days when real peo­ple did real exper­i­ments to gain knowledge.

Point 3. SAME AS POINT 2

Point 4. This does not alter the fact that New­ton used toys to learn more about his craft! And what in your mind was the pur­pose for the visu­al­iza­tion? If not to demon­stra­tion a principle!

Point 5. There was noth­ing I said or did that was embar­rass­ment. I just hap­pen to have man­ners, some­thing you seem to be lack­ing. I only said that because you were bitch­ing about my deleted com­ment. What I would have said if I did not have man­ners would be.
“If it was deleted then it was not for you to see. So just move along to the next com­ment idiot!

I am always amazed how fast peo­ple are ready to call oth­ers names or make dis­parag­ing com­ments on the internet!

Asi­nine Rhetoric (There are two iden­ti­cal replies there lol. This is what I mean by read­ing your own com­ments before you post them. It shows that you don’t have a very broad atten­tion span.)

Asi­nine Rhetoric If there are two replies then it should be twice as easy to read and reply too. I can only assume you read it, how­ever I don’t see any reply lol Any­thing not to reply to the ques­tions and points that were made. lol what a waste of sperm!
But this is most likely because youtube mixes up the post and I wanted to make sure I got all of your stu­pid replies so I can post this con­ver­sa­tion on my site for all to see what an idiot does when he can’t reply to sim­ple ques­tions. As you have done. Have a look. LMAO!

This is how his type replies to Questions!

Just don’t reply to it!

As it always hap­pens on youtube peo­ple can’t seem to have a civil con­ver­sa­tion (Myself included). With these peo­ple it always comes down to name call­ing so there is no need to post any­more because I’m not going to get any­thing like a use­ful con­ver­sa­tion from the one. You may have noticed that he never reply to any ques­tion after talk­ing about grav­ity and Aircraft.


I put this in the story because it has the impor­tant com­ments that Eisen­hower made on Acad­e­mia. And if you view the full video you might find out infor­ma­tion we don’t learn in school!

THIS IS WHY I BELIEVE LIT­TLE OF WHAT CON­VE­NIONAL SCI­ENCE TELL US CAN’T BE DONE! OR EVEN WHAT THEY SAY HAP­PENS IN THE NAT­URAL WORLD AND SPACE.

{jcom­ments on}


Wise Words

CB Login

If you have added a com­ment that was posted after 2017 on Genet­icMem­ory you already have an account. Using the e-​mail address that you use to post your com­ment ask to reset your pass­word or to get the account username!

Oth­er­wise send an email to
web­mas­ter
to request an account.
webmaster@​geneticmemory.​org

Our Online Users

We have 115 guests and 3 mem­bers online
ron — 16:44

Site com­mu­nity video in user blog area. Under forum in the menu.

Ron‘G — 09:51

My first blog post is up, stop by and check it out.

JoomJunk — 20:00

Wel­come to the Shoutbox

Can­cel
Web Analytics