House Resolution 6666 is now House Resolution 68
House Resolution 6666 (now HR68 which has passed in the House and headed for the Senate) if passed will allow the policy enforcement officers (The Police) to come into your house and remove family members if they show signs (a code for anybody they deem should be removed) of Covid19 and be quarntined in a government facility. (In other words this would be public policy) I’m not a fontune teller, however, this site was made with this type of situation in mind, giving you the minimum needed to defend yourself in a commerical process ie:court. In other words this site was/is for emergencies as far as lawful proesses are concern.(I believe this wil be done with public policy and commerical law.) That was at lease it’s original perpose. Right Now, no matter if you know it, or you don’t, you are in a state of emergency.
Ask Dr.Buttar
If you can’t view the video notify the admin, if this happens and you are interested in it. (members use the site mail.) for others use This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
It is imperative that you understand the quote from Judge
Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 72, 75.
The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. [If you don’t know your right, or if you only know what someone told you without it being documented via United States Code you are defenceless] It is a fighting clause. [It is a battle field and the first to leave (fail to defend themselves) is the loser] Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. [In a real court of law no one can defend your right– That should tell you that you have never been in a real court of law unless you have moved the court to common law] McAlister v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S. Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Commonwealth v. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum v. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876.
From Freedom-School.com (Highly Recommeded)
Only Belligerents Have Rights |
|---|
|
by Richard C. Donaldson and Alfred Adask
The individual Rights guaranteed by our Constitution can be compromised or ignored by our government. For example, in United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 539 (D. Pa. 1947), Federal District Court Judge James Alger Fee ruled that, “The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a FIGHTING clause. It’s benefits can be retained only by sustained COMBAT. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in person.” McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L.Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection.… He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.” [Emphasis added.] Notice the verdict’s confrontational language: “fighting”, “combat”, and most surprising, “belligerent”. Did you ever expect to ever read a Federal Court condemn citizens for being “passive” or “ignorant”? Did you ever expect to see a verdict that encouraged citizens to be “belligerent” IN COURT…? Better go back and re-read that extraordinary verdict. And read it again. And commit it to memory, for it succinctly describes the essence of the American legal system. Clearly, we must do SOMETHING, for as Sir Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” But apathy (“doing nothing”) isn’t simply a function of cowardice or indifference; “apathy” is a synonym for “ignorance”. What is it — apathy or ignorance? “I don’t know and I don’t care.” Ignorance makes the public more “manageable” in the courts and in confrontations with the government. Insofar as government naturally seeks to expand its powers at the expense of the citizen’s Rights, government has a vested interest in the public’s ignorance and consequent apathy. The interest in expanding its powers encourages the government to provide little, no, or even false, education on what our Rights should be. If you are a product [victim] of the public school system then consider this, The Department of Education gets what it pays for. …and you need to ‘get yourself smart’ — the sooner the better! This is not a good time for ‘dumb-ass’. |
‘Silence gives consent’, is the rule of business life. To stand by, in silence, and see another sell your property, binds you. Silence gives rise to fraud — or — silence gives rise to agreement. What better way to acquiesce than to not object? I’ve already been on the battle field (Court Is The True Battle For Free Thinking Souls), have you?Bigger question is have you ever thought about it?
|
what is the matrix?
Control!
