This site is run by a United State Veteran.

21 years of com­mu­nity servive.

masyhead

The Cur­rent Year is 6264

Nobody can do every­thing, but every­body can do something!

Work for Peace


House Res­o­lu­tion 6666 if passed will allow the pol­icy enforce­ment offi­cers (The Police) to come into your house and remove fam­ily mem­bers if they show signs (a code for any­body they deem should be removed) of Covid19 and be quarn­tined in a gov­ern­ment facil­ity. I’m not a fontune teller, how­ever, this site was made with this type of sit­u­a­tion in mind, giv­ing you the min­i­mum needed to defend to your­self in a com­mer­i­cal process ie:court. In other words this site was/​is for emer­gen­cies (As far as law­ful processes are con­cern) That was at lease it’s orig­i­nal per­pose. Right Now, no mat­ter if you know it, or you don’t, you are in a state of emergency.

Ask Dr.Buttar

If you can’t view the video notify the admin, if this hap­pens and you are inter­ested in it. (mem­bers use the site mail.) for oth­ers use This email address is being pro­tected from spam­bots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

It is imper­a­tive that you under­stand the quote from Judge

Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 72, 75.

The priv­i­lege against self-​incrimination is nei­ther accorded to the pas­sive resis­tant, nor the per­son who is igno­rant of his rights, nor to one indif­fer­ent thereto. [If you don’t know your right, or if you only know what some­one told you with­out it being doc­u­mented via United States Code you are defence­less] It is a fight­ing clause. [It is a bat­tle field and the first to leave (fail to defend them­selves) is the loser] Its ben­e­fits can be retained only by sus­tained com­bat. It can­not be claimed by attor­ney or solic­i­tor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a bel­liger­ent claimant in per­son. [In a real court of law no one can defend your right– That should tell you that you have never been in a real court of law unless you have moved the court to com­mon law] McAl­is­ter v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S. Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Com­mon­wealth v. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum v. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876.

Sign The Petition

From Free​dom​-School​.com (Highly Recommeded)

Only Bel­liger­ents Have Rights

by Richard C. Don­ald­son and Alfred Adask

The indi­vid­ual Rights guar­an­teed by our Con­sti­tu­tion can be com­pro­mised or ignored by our gov­ern­ment. For exam­ple, in United States v. John­son, 76 F. Supp. 538, 539 (D. Pa. 1947), Fed­eral Dis­trict Court Judge James Alger Fee ruled that,

The priv­i­lege against self-​incrimination is nei­ther accorded to the pas­sive resis­tant, nor to the per­son who is igno­rant of his rights, nor to one indif­fer­ent thereto. It is a FIGHT­ING clause. It’s ben­e­fits can be retained only by sus­tained COM­BAT. It can­not be claimed by attor­ney or solic­i­tor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a BEL­LIGER­ENT claimant in per­son.” McAl­is­ter vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L.Ed. 671; Com­mon­wealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The one who is per­suaded by hon­eyed words or moral sua­sion to tes­tify or pro­duce doc­u­ments rather than make a last ditch stand, sim­ply loses the pro­tec­tion.… He must refuse to answer or pro­duce, and test the mat­ter in con­tempt pro­ceed­ings, or by habeas cor­pus.” [Empha­sis added.]

Notice the verdict’s con­fronta­tional lan­guage: “fight­ing”, “com­bat”, and most sur­pris­ing, “bel­liger­ent”. Did you ever expect to ever read a Fed­eral Court con­demn cit­i­zens for being “pas­sive” or “igno­rant”? Did you ever expect to see a ver­dict that encour­aged cit­i­zens to be “bel­liger­ent” IN COURT…?

Bet­ter go back and re-​read that extra­or­di­nary ver­dict. And read it again. And com­mit it to mem­ory, for it suc­cinctly describes the essence of the Amer­i­can legal system.

Clearly, we must do SOME­THING, for as Sir Edmund Burke said,

The only thing nec­es­sary for evil to tri­umph is for good men to do noth­ing.

But apa­thy (“doing noth­ing”) isn’t sim­ply a func­tion of cow­ardice or indif­fer­ence; “apa­thy” is a syn­onym for “ignorance”.

What is it — apa­thy or igno­rance? “I don’t know and I don’t care.”

Igno­rance makes the pub­lic more “man­age­able” in the courts and in con­fronta­tions with the gov­ern­ment. Inso­far as gov­ern­ment nat­u­rally seeks to expand its pow­ers at the expense of the citizen’s Rights, gov­ern­ment has a vested inter­est in the public’s igno­rance and con­se­quent apa­thy. The inter­est in expand­ing its pow­ers encour­ages the gov­ern­ment to pro­vide lit­tle, no, or even false, edu­ca­tion on what our Rights should be.

If you are a prod­uct [vic­tim] of the pub­lic school sys­tem then con­sider this, The Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion gets what it pays for. …and you need to ‘get your­self smart’ — the sooner the bet­ter! This is not a good time for ‘dumb-​ass’.


Silence gives con­sent’, is the rule of busi­ness life. To stand by, in silence, and see another sell your prop­erty, binds you. Silence gives rise to fraud — or — silence gives rise to agree­ment. What bet­ter way to acqui­esce than to not object?
Acqui­es­cence is acceptance!

I’ve already been on the bat­tle field (Court Is The True Bat­tle For Free Think­ing Souls), have you?

Big­ger ques­tion is have you ever thought about it?


If you do noth­ing else, Check out the for­got­ten post sec­tion on the home page (Top Left). It’s the rea­son the site was made. If you are going to court read or lis­ten to Free Speech Radio, Seat-​belts 1 & 2 and Cog­ni­tive Dis­so­nance at High Frequency!In that order. Posted in Audio and text format.

The Orig­i­nal 3th Party.….. Pigs = 1% “all over the World”

Web Analytics