I am not this hair or this skin, I'm the soul that lives within...

masyhead

The Cur­rent Year is 6265


House Res­o­lu­tion 6666 is now House Res­o­lu­tion 68

House Res­o­lu­tion 6666 (now HR68 which has passed in the House and headed for the Sen­ate) if passed will allow the pol­icy enforce­ment offi­cers (The Police) to come into your house and remove fam­ily mem­bers if they show signs (a code for any­body they deem should be removed) of Covid19 and be quarn­tined in a gov­ern­ment facil­ity. (In other words this would be pub­lic pol­icy) I’m not a fontune teller, how­ever, this site was made with this type of sit­u­a­tion in mind, giv­ing you the min­i­mum needed to defend your­self in a com­mer­i­cal process ie:court. In other words this site was/​is for emer­gen­cies as far as law­ful proesses are con­cern.(I believe this wil be done with pub­lic pol­icy and com­mer­i­cal law.) That was at lease it’s orig­i­nal per­pose. Right Now, no mat­ter if you know it, or you don’t, you are in a state of emergency.

Ask Dr.Buttar

If you can’t view the video notify the admin, if this hap­pens and you are inter­ested in it. (mem­bers use the site mail.) for oth­ers use This email address is being pro­tected from spam­bots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

It is imper­a­tive that you under­stand the quote from Judge

Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 72, 75.

The priv­i­lege against self-​incrimination is nei­ther accorded to the pas­sive resis­tant, nor the per­son who is igno­rant of his rights, nor to one indif­fer­ent thereto. [If you don’t know your right, or if you only know what some­one told you with­out it being doc­u­mented via United States Code you are defence­less] It is a fight­ing clause. [It is a bat­tle field and the first to leave (fail to defend them­selves) is the loser] Its ben­e­fits can be retained only by sus­tained com­bat. It can­not be claimed by attor­ney or solic­i­tor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a bel­liger­ent claimant in per­son. [In a real court of law no one can defend your right– That should tell you that you have never been in a real court of law unless you have moved the court to com­mon law] McAl­is­ter v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S. Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Com­mon­wealth v. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum v. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876.

Sign The Petition

From Free​dom​-School​.com (Highly Recommeded)

Only Bel­liger­ents Have Rights

by Richard C. Don­ald­son and Alfred Adask

The indi­vid­ual Rights guar­an­teed by our Con­sti­tu­tion can be com­pro­mised or ignored by our gov­ern­ment. For exam­ple, in United States v. John­son, 76 F. Supp. 538, 539 (D. Pa. 1947), Fed­eral Dis­trict Court Judge James Alger Fee ruled that,

The priv­i­lege against self-​incrimination is nei­ther accorded to the pas­sive resis­tant, nor to the per­son who is igno­rant of his rights, nor to one indif­fer­ent thereto. It is a FIGHT­ING clause. It’s ben­e­fits can be retained only by sus­tained COM­BAT. It can­not be claimed by attor­ney or solic­i­tor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a BEL­LIGER­ENT claimant in per­son.” McAl­is­ter vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L.Ed. 671; Com­mon­wealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The one who is per­suaded by hon­eyed words or moral sua­sion to tes­tify or pro­duce doc­u­ments rather than make a last ditch stand, sim­ply loses the pro­tec­tion.… He must refuse to answer or pro­duce, and test the mat­ter in con­tempt pro­ceed­ings, or by habeas cor­pus.” [Empha­sis added.]

Notice the verdict’s con­fronta­tional lan­guage: “fight­ing”, “com­bat”, and most sur­pris­ing, “bel­liger­ent”. Did you ever expect to ever read a Fed­eral Court con­demn cit­i­zens for being “pas­sive” or “igno­rant”? Did you ever expect to see a ver­dict that encour­aged cit­i­zens to be “bel­liger­ent” IN COURT…?

Bet­ter go back and re-​read that extra­or­di­nary ver­dict. And read it again. And com­mit it to mem­ory, for it suc­cinctly describes the essence of the Amer­i­can legal system.

Clearly, we must do SOME­THING, for as Sir Edmund Burke said,

The only thing nec­es­sary for evil to tri­umph is for good men to do noth­ing.

But apa­thy (“doing noth­ing”) isn’t sim­ply a func­tion of cow­ardice or indif­fer­ence; “apa­thy” is a syn­onym for “ignorance”.

What is it — apa­thy or igno­rance? “I don’t know and I don’t care.”

Igno­rance makes the pub­lic more “man­age­able” in the courts and in con­fronta­tions with the gov­ern­ment. Inso­far as gov­ern­ment nat­u­rally seeks to expand its pow­ers at the expense of the citizen’s Rights, gov­ern­ment has a vested inter­est in the public’s igno­rance and con­se­quent apa­thy. The inter­est in expand­ing its pow­ers encour­ages the gov­ern­ment to pro­vide lit­tle, no, or even false, edu­ca­tion on what our Rights should be.

If you are a prod­uct [vic­tim] of the pub­lic school sys­tem then con­sider this, The Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion gets what it pays for. …and you need to ‘get your­self smart’ — the sooner the bet­ter! This is not a good time for ‘dumb-​ass’.


Silence gives con­sent’, is the rule of busi­ness life. To stand by, in silence, and see another sell your prop­erty, binds you. Silence gives rise to fraud — or — silence gives rise to agree­ment. What bet­ter way to acqui­esce than to not object?
Acqui­es­cence is acceptance!

I’ve already been on the bat­tle field (Court Is The True Bat­tle For Free Think­ing Souls), have you?

Big­ger ques­tion is have you ever thought about it?

what is the matrix?

Con­trol!


Whats New in Gaza

If you do nothing else, Check out the forgotten post section on the home page (Top Left). It's the reason the site was made. If you are going to court read listen to Free Speech Radio, Seat-belts 1 & 2 and Cog­ni­tive Dis­so­nance at High Fre­quency! In that order. Posted in Audio and text format.

Why You Should Not Wear A Mask!

Who Dat ?

We have 20 guests and no mem­bers online